>System32 should be on the PATH, and reg.exe should be available in XP.
>C'est la vie. Try "%windir%\System32\reg.exe" instead of "reg". No
>rush. It's just an icon.
sorry eryksun its my fault i havent been clear... im actually using windows
vista not xp. i mixed your new command with the old but
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
>>Check the output of the following command:
>
>>reg query HKLM\Software\Classes\Python.File\DefaultIcon
>
>>For me the value is "C:\Python33\DLLs\py.ico".
>
> i get: 'reg' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
> progra
>Check the output of the following command:
> reg query HKLM\Software\Classes\Python.File\DefaultIcon
>For me the value is "C:\Python33\DLLs\py.ico".
i get: 'reg' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
program or batch file.__
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
> due to the last 2 posts i was able to locate and delete the Iconcache.db
> through cmd. But after restarting, even though i have the refreshed cache,
> the icons are still not displaying properly.
Check the output of the following command:
r
due to the last 2 posts i was able to locate and delete the Iconcache.db
through cmd. But after restarting, even though i have the refreshed cache, the
icons are still not displaying properly. Will that website
http://www.trishtech.com/winxp/rebuild_icon_cache_in_windows_xp.php provide an
al
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
>>del /a %localappdata%\IconCache.db
>
>>It will be rebuilt at your next login.
>
> that last command returns "The system cannot find the path specified." Any
> ideas which directory i should do that in?
Sorry, I haven't used XP (NT 5) in a lon
On 03/05/2013 02:43 AM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
Installing 3.3 associated .py files with %windir%\py.exe, but it seems
the icon cache wasn't refreshed. You can trigger a refresh by setting
any default in the "Default Programs" control panel applet. If that
fails, you can manually delete the cache fro
>Installing 3.3 associated .py files with %windir%\py.exe, but it seems
>the icon cache wasn't refreshed. You can trigger a refresh by setting
>any default in the "Default Programs" control panel applet. If that
>fails, you can manually delete the cache from the cmd shell:
> del /a %localappd
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
>
> #!c:\python3.3\python.exe (or wherever the installation directory
> actually is)
>
> or what Eryksun suggested:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python3.0
>
> I can't tell which would be right, since I don't run Windows. Any more.
Both forms work. The
On 03/04/2013 11:57 PM, eryksun wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
no if i double click the .py file, Python 3.3 opens all of my python 3
files. A lot of 3.0 files won't run but that's okay. Now on my command line
if i enter the correct version's directory, and use: python
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
> no if i double click the .py file, Python 3.3 opens all of my python 3
> files. A lot of 3.0 files won't run but that's okay. Now on my command line
> if i enter the correct version's directory, and use: python myfile.py then
> the correct versio
> (Please get the quoting right in your messages. Either you've got a
> brain-dead mail program, or you're trying to bypass it's methods.
> On your last message you attributed Eryksun's comments as though they were
> your own.)
sorry this is yahoo's fault, i have to manually insert the ">"
(Please get the quoting right in your messages. Either you've got a
brain-dead mail program, or you're trying to bypass it's methods. On
your last message you attributed Eryksun's comments as though they were
your own.)
On 03/04/2013 09:49 PM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
no sorry i made a mistake it
I don't know how that's working. There are no executables or batch
files with those names in the default installations. It's always
"python.exe". Plus the default install options don't muck with the
PATH environment variable. Did you rename (or NTFS symlink) the
executables and add the install dire
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
>>then you should be able to say
>> python3.3 myscript.py
>>or python3.0 myscript.py
>
> thanks it installed independently like you said. and those python3.3 or
> python3.0 in the command line seems to do the trick!
I don't know how that's wo
thanks for the recommendations. I think i will try a smaller framework first
(haven't decided which) to learn how it all works without the additional
features. Then probably will go for Django after i get comfortable working with
the web ___
Tuto
>Python 3.3 will definitely install independently of 3.0 on Windows. It's only
>the minor versions that happen in place, like going from 3.3 >to 3.3.1
>If you're running your scripts explicitly, by something like:
> python myscript.py
>then you should be able to say
> python3.3 myscript.p
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 17:58 +, Alan Gauld wrote:
[…]
> There are so many web frameworks for Python that asking which is bet is
> rather pointless. They are all fairly good, some are very good for
> specific tasks, others are more general. The main thing to start with is
> pick one and learn
On 04/03/13 16:30, Lolo Lolo wrote:
Also i want to learn web development ...
ask which is a better bet, Bottle or Cherrypy? ... Also is Pyramid a
lightweight framework as its description suggests or is it big/complex
like Django?
There are so many web frameworks for Python that asking which is
On 03/04/2013 11:30 AM, Lolo Lolo wrote:
Hey all, i am running python 3.0 but i realized a lot of modules that support
version 3 do not support 3.0. now i want to install Python 3.3 but im worried
the two versions (3.0 and 3.3) might confuse my machine. i don't want to lose
my work in 3.0 and
Hey all, i am running python 3.0 but i realized a lot of modules that support
version 3 do not support 3.0. now i want to install Python 3.3 but im worried
the two versions (3.0 and 3.3) might confuse my machine. i don't want to lose
my work in 3.0 and i installed some modules and saved some wor
21 matches
Mail list logo
