On Nov 3, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
[byte]
>
>>
>> Bill, I appreciate your comment and have given it much thought, Ramit made
>> one much the same the other day. Here lies the potential problem, though it
>> might not be one at all, I need to do some experimenting. While I am
On 04/11/2012 01:05, richard kappler wrote:
I notice no one has mentioned asyncore. Is that something I should stay
away from? I just started digging through the doc file.
regards, Richard
If you're really interested read the thread "The Async API of the
future" and its derivatives on the Py
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, richard kappler wrote:
> I notice no one has mentioned asyncore. Is that something I should stay away
> from? I just started digging through the doc file.
Regardless of ones' feelings on it, there is no builtin support for
multiprocessing using asyncore.
-- Devin
>I didn't really understand the above. Is 'manager' some kind of library?
>
> http://docs.python.org/2/library/multiprocessing.html#managers
>
>
> >Who's Bill? Alan was referring to Twisted that is an event driven
> >framework. Event driven or asynchronous processing is a third option
> >(after thr
On 4 November 2012 01:05, richard kappler wrote:
> I notice no one has mentioned asyncore. Is that something I should stay away
> from? I just started digging through the doc file.
I've only briefly looked at asyncore. I've never heard anyone
recommend it: the recommendations for asynchronous pro
On 4 November 2012 01:03, richard kappler wrote:
> Oscar, that was positively brilliant! Now I get it, I understand how to do
> it, and I think this has rearranged my entire plan for the "MCP." If the MCP
> is basically just a program that calls several other programs(processes) and
> does that bi
I notice no one has mentioned asyncore. Is that something I should stay
away from? I just started digging through the doc file.
regards, Richard
--
quando omni flunkus moritati
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscript
Oscar, that was positively brilliant! Now I get it, I understand how to do
it, and I think this has rearranged my entire plan for the "MCP." If the
MCP is basically just a program that calls several other
programs(processes) and does that bit of coordination between each, then my
life just got meas
On 03/11/12 22:49, Alan Gauld wrote:
That's another common pattern - especially in old COOL mainframes!
Given my background that may have been a Freudian slip but
I did mean COBOL! honest! :-)
--
Alan G
Author of the Learn to Program web site
http://www.alan-g.me.uk/
__
On 03/11/12 20:20, richard kappler wrote:
SO... while the bot program is running, I would like it to be
continuously cognizant of the sensor data and any changes in that data.
Let's distill it down to a single sensor to simplify the discussion. If
I have a temperature sensor feeding data to the
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> how_many_spams = Value('i', 1)
>
> p1 = Process(target=update_brain)
> p2 = Process(target=chat_with_friends)
>
> p1.start()
> p2.start()
In Linux you can easily inherit the global Value object in forked
processes, but it's not that hard t
On 3 November 2012 20:20, richard kappler wrote:
> To all, especially Dave, Oscar and Ramit, thanks for the discussion and
> help. Tino, as soon as I have something to put up, I will gladly put it up
> on Github. At the moment I only have a few snippets I've written in trying
> to learn the variou
To all, especially Dave, Oscar and Ramit, thanks for the discussion and
help. Tino, as soon as I have something to put up, I will gladly put it up
on Github. At the moment I only have a few snippets I've written in trying
to learn the various bits everyone has been helping me with.
Just for the re
On 10/30/2012 05:10 PM, richard kappler wrote:
> Oscar, thanks for the link, though I must say with all due respect, if it
> was "obvious" I wouldn't have had to ask the question. Good link though. I
> suspect the reason I didn't find it is I did my searches under threading as
> opposed to multi-pr
On 30 October 2012 21:10, richard kappler wrote:
> Oscar, thanks for the link, though I must say with all due respect, if it
> was "obvious" I wouldn't have had to ask the question. Good link though. I
> suspect the reason I didn't find it is I did my searches under threading as
> opposed to multi
Oscar, thanks for the link, though I must say with all due respect, if it
was "obvious" I wouldn't have had to ask the question. Good link though. I
suspect the reason I didn't find it is I did my searches under threading as
opposed to multi-processing.
Dave, no offense taken, great write-up. Now
On 10/30/2012 03:18 PM, richard kappler wrote:
> As I sit through the aftermath of Sandy, I have resumed my personal quest
> to learn python. One of the things I am struggling with is running multiple
> processes. I read the docs on threading and am completely lost so am
> turning to the most excel
richard kappler wrote:
> As I sit through the aftermath of Sandy, I have resumed my personal quest to
> learn python. One of the things I
> am struggling with is running multiple processes. I read the docs on
> threading and am completely lost so am
> turning to the most excellent tutors here (an
On 30 October 2012 19:18, richard kappler wrote:
> As I sit through the aftermath of Sandy, I have resumed my personal quest to
> learn python. One of the things I am struggling with is running multiple
> processes. I read the docs on threading and am completely lost so am turning
> to the most ex
As I sit through the aftermath of Sandy, I have resumed my personal quest
to learn python. One of the things I am struggling with is running multiple
processes. I read the docs on threading and am completely lost so am
turning to the most excellent tutors here (and thanks for all the help,
past, pr
20 matches
Mail list logo
