Alan Gauld schrieb:
>
> Fine, but I would seriously consider learning dicts as a prioritry.
> Certainly way higher that learning OOP. In fact being comfortable
> with dictionaries will make understanding OOP much easier
> since a class is really just a special type of dictionary!.
>
> Alan G.
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>>> And I thought I might get away without using dicts...
>>
>> Why would you want to? Dicts are one of the most
>> powerful data structures around.
> Well, I know about dicts, however I want to go forward step by step
> in
> learning - once I feel really comfortable wi
Alan Gauld schrieb:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
>> And I thought I might get away without using dicts...
>
> Why would you want to? Dicts are one of the most
> powerful data structures around.
>
> And besides Python is built from dicts so you can
> never truly get away without using them. E
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> And I thought I might get away without using dicts...
Why would you want to? Dicts are one of the most
powerful data structures around.
And besides Python is built from dicts so you can
never truly get away without using them. Every time
you access a feature from
That's it!
Paul
Andreas Kostyrka schrieb:
> What you probably want is to pass:
>
> writer(None, "field1", "field2")
>
> Andreas
>
> Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 16:28 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> And I thought I might get away without using dicts...
>>
>> Thanks, Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg G
What you probably want is to pass:
writer(None, "field1", "field2")
Andreas
Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 16:28 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> And I thought I might get away without using dicts...
>
> Thanks, Greg
>
>
>
> Greg Graham schrieb:
> > Paul,
> >
> > Python does not allow mixing
And I thought I might get away without using dicts...
Thanks, Greg
Greg Graham schrieb:
> Paul,
>
> Python does not allow mixing variable length arguments and keyword arguments
> in that way. To accomplish what you want, you must add an argument preceded
> by a "**" which will be a dict cont
ennummer, anrede, vorname, nachname, plz, ort, adresse,
kontoinhaber, blz, kto, bankname, status, spielbeginn, letzte_aenderung,
importdatum, briefdatum, buchungsdatum, stornodatum
Output csv filename: None
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
I don't get this - what is the clean way of the order of passing
arguments to functions?
The called function goes like this:
def csvwriter(output_csv_filename=None, *coloumn_definitions):
"""Edit Me!"""
if output_csv_filename == None:
output_csv_filename = raw_