On Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:29, Dick Moores wrote:
> I meant that the order "min, max" is more intuitive than "max,
> min". Don't you agree? And it's the order used in random.randint(),
> random.randrange(), and random.uniform(), for examples.
What about two intuitively named functions, like
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:29:54 -0800
Dick Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> >
> >def my_function(min, max=None):
> > if max is None:
> > max = min
> > min = 0
> > # stuff
>
> Great!
>
> >I am not sure if this is more intuitive though.
>
> >>>
> def my_function(min
At 02:28 AM 12/6/2006, Michael Lange wrote:
>On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:18:02 -0800
>Dick Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Say I have a function,
> >
> > def my_function(max, min=0):
> > return max - min
> >
> > The order of arguments is counterintuitive, but it seems it can't be
> > change
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:18:02 -0800
Dick Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Say I have a function,
>
> def my_function(max, min=0):
> return max - min
>
> The order of arguments is counterintuitive, but it seems it can't be
> changed if I want to have a default min. Is there way to write
>
Say I have a function,
def my_function(max, min=0):
return max - min
The order of arguments is counterintuitive, but it seems it can't be
changed if I want to have a default min. Is there way to write
def my_function(min=0, max):
stuff
Thanks,
Dick Moores
