On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Paul McGuire wrote:
> The example you cited of creating a thin derived class from object, for the
> simple purpose of supporting dynamically assigned attributes, sometimes goes
> by the name Bag, from the Smalltalk object framework.
Another variation is Bunch, tho
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:36:42 -0600
"Paul McGuire" wrote:
> Denis -
Hello Paul,
pleased to read you again ;-)
> What you are seeing is standard procedure for any built-in type - no dynamic
> assignment of attributes allowed. Here is an analogous case to your
> example, but based on str instead
Denis -
What you are seeing is standard procedure for any built-in type - no dynamic
assignment of attributes allowed. Here is an analogous case to your
example, but based on str instead of object:
greeting = "bon jour"
greeting.language = "French" # raises AttributeError: 'str' object has no
a
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:10 AM, spir wrote:
> Can someone explain the following?
>
>
> class Type(object):
>pass
> o = Type()
> o.a = 1
> print o, o.a
> print dir(object)
> ==> ['__class__', '__delattr__', '__doc__', '__getattribute__', '__hash__',
> '__init_
"spir" wrote
Can someone explain the following?
Not really an explanation but I did notice when repeating your
experiment that your class instance has a __dict__ attribute
but object does not. The new attribute a is apparently
located in the dict.
class C(object): pass
...
o = object()
c
Can someone explain the following?
class Type(object):
pass
o = Type()
o.a = 1
print o, o.a
print dir(object)
==> ['__class__', '__delattr__', '__doc__', '__getattribute__', '__hash__',
'__init__', '__new__',
'__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setat
