[Tutor] name error

2014-07-15 Thread ugajin
Thanks all, for your time and trouble spent on this issue.    There are other 2D packages around including; Shoebot, which runs Python 2.7 and is a rewrite of nodebox 1, and is said to be inspired by DrawBot and Shoes. However, its installation is not well documented (or straightforward). node

Re: [Tutor] name error

2014-07-14 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:13:33PM -0400, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: [...] > To draw a default rectangle using the nodebox 1, IDE you would simply > write: rect(0, 0, 100, 100) to a .py file. When run in nodebox 1, IDE > it does what you might expect. It renders a 100 x 100 (px) rectangle > sh

Re: [Tutor] name error

2014-07-14 Thread Dave Angel
uga...@talktalk.net Wrote in message: > I am running nodebox 1 on OSX v10.6.8, which is an open source OSX > Python, 2D data visualiser, and although not legacy, the software it > isn't well supported. (see http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Home for > further info). I believe nodebox 1, runs wi

Re: [Tutor] name error

2014-07-14 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 14/07/2014 19:18, Alan Gauld wrote: On 14/07/14 17:13, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: I am running nodebox 1 on OSX v10.6.8, which is an open source OSX Python, 2D data visualiser, I can't help with the actual query, sorry. But are you tied to nodebox for a reason? There are other 2D packages a

Re: [Tutor] name error

2014-07-14 Thread Alan Gauld
On 14/07/14 17:13, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: I am running nodebox 1 on OSX v10.6.8, which is an open source OSX Python, 2D data visualiser, I can't help with the actual query, sorry. But are you tied to nodebox for a reason? There are other 2D packages around, maybe a different package (with

[Tutor] name error

2014-07-14 Thread ugajin
I am running nodebox 1 on OSX v10.6.8, which is an open source OSX Python, 2D data visualiser, and although not legacy, the software it isn't well supported. (see http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Home for further info).  I believe nodebox 1, runs with Python 2.5    This may be too specialised