On 27/05/13 10:43, Jim Mooney wrote:
On 26 May 2013 17:38, eryksun wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 27/05/13 07:40, Jim Mooney wrote:
Good to know that compile doesn't check syntax, since I erroneously
thought it did.
compile does check syntax.
Attemptin
On 26 May 2013 17:38, eryksun wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On 27/05/13 07:40, Jim Mooney wrote:
>>
>>> Good to know that compile doesn't check syntax, since I erroneously
>>> thought it did.
>>
>> compile does check syntax.
>
> Attempting to iterate an integ
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On 27/05/13 07:40, Jim Mooney wrote:
>
>> Good to know that compile doesn't check syntax, since I erroneously
>> thought it did.
>
> compile does check syntax.
Attempting to iterate an integer is a runtime TypeError, not a
compile-time Syn
On 26 May 2013 17:20, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On 27/05/13 07:40, Jim Mooney wrote:
>
>> Good to know that compile doesn't check syntax, since I erroneously
>> thought it did.
>
>
> compile does check syntax.
I'm unclear on something. The code below creates bytecode and I don't
see an error messa
On 27/05/13 07:40, Jim Mooney wrote:
Good to know that compile doesn't check syntax, since I erroneously
thought it did.
compile does check syntax.
py> compile("23 = 43", "", "exec")
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "", line 1
SyntaxError: can't assign to lite
On 26/05/2013 22:40, Jim Mooney wrote:
On 26 May 2013 02:51, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Basically no. Python 2.7 is guaranteed to be backward compatible with
Python 2.6. New or improved functionality will be listed in the "What's New
for Python 2.7". In fact if you look at the "What's New for Pyth
On 26 May 2013 02:51, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Basically no. Python 2.7 is guaranteed to be backward compatible with
> Python 2.6. New or improved functionality will be listed in the "What's New
> for Python 2.7". In fact if you look at the "What's New for Python 3.3"
> you'll find all of the "Wh
On 26/05/2013 05:10, Jim Mooney wrote:
On 25 May 2013 20:49, Tim Hanson wrote:
A lot of people tend to be intimidated by Mark Lutz, and so am I, I guess.
Interesting coincidence. This is a retirement project and I just
decided on the Lutz book, which looked comprehensive, since the book
I'm
On Saturday, May 25, 2013 09:10:00 pm Jim Mooney wrote:
> On 25 May 2013 20:49, Tim Hanson wrote:
> > A lot of people tend to be intimidated by Mark Lutz, and so am I, I
> > guess.
>
> Interesting coincidence. This is a retirement project and I just
> decided on the Lutz book, which looked compre
On 25 May 2013 20:49, Tim Hanson wrote:
> A lot of people tend to be intimidated by Mark Lutz, and so am I, I guess.
Interesting coincidence. This is a retirement project and I just
decided on the Lutz book, which looked comprehensive, since the book
I'm using is more CompSci but PyDeficient. Ho
On Saturday, May 25, 2013 08:31:49 pm Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Greetings Tim,
>
> : I'm new to this, just getting through the first Mark Lutz book.
>
> Python objects, either variables your ham below or the string 'spam'
> you entered manually have a specific type. Each and every variable
> or
Greetings Tim,
: I'm new to this, just getting through the first Mark Lutz book.
Python objects, either variables your ham below or the string 'spam'
you entered manually have a specific type. Each and every variable
or object has a type.
I think you are trying to figure out how you start
On 26/05/2013 04:07, Tim Hanson wrote:
I'm new to this, just getting through the first Mark Lutz book.
If I start out with :
ham=list('spam');ham
['s','p','a','m']
How do I get a string back?
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or
I'm new to this, just getting through the first Mark Lutz book.
If I start out with :
ham=list('spam');ham
['s','p','a','m']
How do I get a string back?
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mai
14 matches
Mail list logo
