On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:44:02 am Jon Crump wrote:
> Just as a matter of curiosity piqued by having to understand someone
> else's code. Is the difference here just a matter of style, or is one
> better somehow than the other?
Remember that list comprehensions didn't exist until a few years ago, so
On 27 July 2010 17:53, Mac Ryan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:44 -0700, Jon Crump wrote:
>> Just as a matter of curiosity piqued by having to understand someone
>> else's code. Is the difference here just a matter of style, or is one
>> better somehow than the other?
>>
>> >>> l
>> [0, 1, 2, 3
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:44 -0700, Jon Crump wrote:
> Just as a matter of curiosity piqued by having to understand someone
> else's code. Is the difference here just a matter of style, or is one
> better somehow than the other?
>
> >>> l
> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
>
> >>> ','.join([str(
Just as a matter of curiosity piqued by having to understand someone
else's code. Is the difference here just a matter of style, or is one
better somehow than the other?
>>> l
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
>>> ','.join([str(x) for x in l])
'0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10'
>>> ','.join(map(lambda x:
