On 29/09/12 07:27, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
I'm not impressed. He sprouts off about how you can't use Python on mobile
devices, when you can. What makes you think his opinions on breaking
working code just because he thinks he knows
On 29/09/12 11:30, Alan Gauld wrote:
On 28/09/12 13:15, Mark Lawrence wrote:
from Calvin Spealman is typical "Also, I'd be completely in support of
dropping round() and agree it gets misused
and leads to too much confusion. We should promote the right ways, and
sometimes to show the right path
On 28/09/12 13:15, Mark Lawrence wrote:
from Calvin Spealman is typical "Also, I'd be completely in support of
dropping round() and agree it gets misused
and leads to too much confusion. We should promote the right ways, and
sometimes to show the right path you need to lock another door and thro
On 28/09/2012 22:07, eryksun wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 28/09/2012 13:37, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Deprecating and dropping features causes pain to developers who are
already using them correctly. There is strong opposition on deprecating
round.
And there
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On 28/09/12 22:15, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>> The Python round function is itself problematic. The idea of deprecating
>> it is currently being discussed on Python ideas. This quote from Calvin
>> Spealman is typical "Also, I'd be completely
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 28/09/2012 13:37, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> Deprecating and dropping features causes pain to developers who are
>> already using them correctly. There is strong opposition on deprecating
>> round.
>
> And there is strong support for depr
On 28/09/2012 13:37, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 28/09/12 22:15, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Deprecating and dropping features causes pain to developers who are already
using them correctly. There is strong opposition on deprecating round.
And there is strong support for deprecating round. Personall
On 28/09/12 22:15, Mark Lawrence wrote:
The Python round function is itself problematic. The idea of deprecating
it is currently being discussed on Python ideas. This quote from Calvin
Spealman is typical "Also, I'd be completely in support of dropping round()
and agree it gets misused and leads
On 09/19/2012 02:27 PM, Andrew Tritt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to python, and I was experimenting with the round function, and
> came across what appears to be a bug in floating point rounding. I am
> guessing there is a valid explanation for it.
Welcome to the Python tutor; hope you enjoy lea
On 28/09/2012 12:56, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On 19 September 2012 19:27, Andrew Tritt wrote:
Hello,
I am new to python, and I was experimenting with the round function, and
came across what appears to be a bug in floating point rounding. I am
guessing there is a valid explanation for it.
When
On 19 September 2012 19:27, Andrew Tritt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to python, and I was experimenting with the round function, and
> came across what appears to be a bug in floating point rounding. I am
> guessing there is a valid explanation for it.
>
> When I round the floating points 10.6[0
Hello,
I am new to python, and I was experimenting with the round function, and
came across what appears to be a bug in floating point rounding. I am
guessing there is a valid explanation for it.
When I round the floating points 10.6[0-9]5 to two decimal places, it
rounds as expected for 6 of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
