Ah, see, I should convince my bosses that I need a Python interpreter.
Of course, then they'd ask what Python was, and why I was thinking
about it at work
Duh, I was just reading the docs, and I kept thinking that an
attribute was just a class variable.
Thanks, Kent, now I have all sorts of i
Liam Clarke wrote:
Hi,
just an expansion on Brian's query, is there a variant of getattr for
instance methods?
i.e. class DBRequest:
def __init__(self, fields, action):
self.get(fields)
def get(self, fields):
print fields
Instead of self.get in _init__, the value of
Hi,
just an expansion on Brian's query, is there a variant of getattr for
instance methods?
i.e. class DBRequest:
def __init__(self, fields, action):
self.get(fields)
def get(self, fields):
print fields
Instead of self.get in _init__, the value of action to call a
Jeff Shannon said unto the world upon 2005-02-16 16:09:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:48:31 -0500, Brian van den Broek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, if you know that you will only have one header per line, then
it's reasonable to process them one line at a time. You could
alternatively have the TP_f
Kent Johnson said unto the world upon 2005-02-16 15:02:
Brian van den Broek wrote:
I had been thinking better to get everything working and then
refactor. Is that an unsound approach? My worry about refactoring now
is that I feel like I am rearranging deck-chairs when I should be
worried about
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:48:31 -0500, Brian van den Broek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Shannon said unto the world upon 2005-02-15 21:20:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:19:37 -0500, Brian van den Broek
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For starters, I've made metadata a class attribute rather t
Brian van den Broek wrote:
As for the code smell thing, I have a follow-up question. I now get the
point of the type-based conditional being a smell for classes. (I get it
due to a previous thread that an over-enthusiastic inbox purge prevents
me from citing with certainty, but I think it was Bi
Brian van den Broek said unto the world upon 2005-02-16 14:04:
Kent Johnson said unto the world upon 2005-02-16 05:58:
if 'text' == self.document_type:
self.do_text_stuff()
if 'RTF' == self.document_type:
self.do_RTF_stuff()
Conditionals on a 'type' flag are a code smell that suggests using
Kent Johnson said unto the world upon 2005-02-16 05:58:
Brian van den Broek wrote:
Also, I know the general security concerns about things like exec.
They make me nervous in using it, even though I am (as yet) the sole
user. Am I right in thinking that the constrained way I am using it
here pro
Kent Johnson wrote:
Another way to do this is to use dispatch methods. If you have extra
processing to do for each tag, this might be a good way to go.
I'm going to assume that your data lines have the form 'tag=data'. Then
your Node class might have methods that look like this:
class Node:
.
Brian van den Broek wrote:
My Node class defines a _parse method which separates out the node
header, and sends those lines to a _parse_metadata method. This is where
the elif chain occurs -- each line of the metadata starts with a tag
like "dt=" and I need to recognize each tag and set the appr
Jeff Shannon said unto the world upon 2005-02-15 21:20:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:19:37 -0500, Brian van den Broek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My Node class defines a _parse method which separates out the node
header, and sends those lines to a _parse_metadata method. This is
where the elif chain occu
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:19:37 -0500, Brian van den Broek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My Node class defines a _parse method which separates out the node
> header, and sends those lines to a _parse_metadata method. This is
> where the elif chain occurs -- each line of the metadata starts with a
> ta
Liam Clarke said unto the world upon 2005-02-15 18:08:
Hi Brian, why not take it the next step and
for key in metadata_dict:
if data.startswith(key):
exec('''self.%s = """%s"""''' %(metadata_dict[key],
data[len(key):]))
# tripl
Hi Brian, why not take it the next step and
> for key in metadata_dict:
> if data.startswith(key):
> exec('''self.%s = """%s"""''' %(metadata_dict[key],
> data[len(key):]))
> # triple quotes as there may be quotes in meta
Brian van den Broek wrote:
[snip text]
class A:
def __init__(self):
self.something = None
self.something_else = None
self.still_another_thing = None
def update(self, data):
for key in metadata_dict:
if data.startswith(key):
exec('''self.%s = ""
Hi all,
I'm still plugging away at my project of writing code to process
treepad files. (This was the task which I posted about in the recent
"help with refactoring needed -- which approach is more Pythonic?"
thread.)
My present problem is how best to reorganize a long (20 elements) elif
chain
17 matches
Mail list logo