On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:09 PM, spir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, would someone clarify the point about decorators? Rather the point of
> having both a built-in function (introduced in python 2.2, as I just read)
> and a "decorator" (2.4) for a single use of declaring a method
> not_to_be_b
Hello again,
I just tried with the classmethod() built_in function. Well, this is
exactly what I was looking for. It supplies a way of defining type_level
methods -- what was missing before.
[I still think this is a workaround: we would not need this if the
syntax was the same for methods and
spir wrote:
Q: Is there a way to write /type/ (class) functions, meaning methods not
bound to an instance, in python?
As Bob Gailer already said, staticmethod seems to do what you want.
After reading your mail, I cannot help wondering that something crucial seems
to be missing in your class s
spir wrote:
Hello,
New to the list. I'm a self-taught, amateur programmer. Also,
non-native english speaker -- so, don't be surprised with weird
expression.
Q: Is there a way to write /type/ (class) functions, meaning methods
not bound to an instance, in python?
Take a look at the built-i
Hello,
New to the list. I'm a self-taught, amateur programmer. Also, non-native
english speaker -- so, don't be surprised with weird expression.
Q: Is there a way to write /type/ (class) functions, meaning methods not
bound to an instance, in python?
Context: I'm developping an application
