Before I use xemacs I use emacs and both are the same.
I don't know if there is connection between cpython and problem in
showing real time console, because both use cpython.
I also want to hear people who use python and emacs/xemacs concerning
this problem.
pujo
On 6/17/05, Alan G <[EMAIL PROTE
> but I don't understand why xemacs doesn't fix C-c C-c
Neither do I. BTW Do you know if this is specific to xemacs?
Or does it also apply to python mode in vanilla GNU emacs too?
I really should get around to loading python-mode and
trying it some day...
Alan G.
_
Hello Alan,
thanks for the advice,
but I don't understand why xemacs doesn't fix C-c C-c so we don't have
to do such many things. in fact C-c C-c is fail to represent the well
'run' behaviour of python ?
It would be nice to people who use python get the same benefit of
typing C-c C-c and get the
Hallo Danny,
I tried the emacs folding customization, but it doesn't work.
After I did it, my xemacs show tripple dot '...' near the method of
class it should be folded.
I don't know how to open my method.
Sincerely Yours,
pujo
On 6/15/05, Danny Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 15
Hello Max,
the problem with running in a dos console terminal is that I have to
switch back and forth from terminal and my xemacs. and I found that in
windows dos console we have to specify buffer page. I do need a
dynamic buffer control so I don't need to specify the buffer if my
program run big
> buffer/output pane before running my program, so I always do
> this to start my program:
> ...
> ...6 steps listed
> ...
> This is one cycle of running.
> Is that normal ???
I doubt it, I've never user python mode in emacs but I have
used SQL and C++ modes and usually you just call C-c C-c fro
thanks Noel,
It is great idea.
pujo
On 6/15/05, Max Noel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2005, at 23:17, Pujo Aji wrote:
>
> > I just use Ctrl+C Ctrl+C to run the code.
> > The code wait for 3 second and show all i all together.
> >
> > I can't feel every second pass.
> >
> > pujo
>
Hallo Danny,
If we always start interpreter everytime we want to run python in
emacs/xemacs, is it counter productive? I usually have to clean the
buffer/output pane before running my program, so I always do this to
start my program:
C-c ! to start the interpreter
C-c o to change my windows
C-c C
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Pujo Aji wrote:
> Thanks Danny,
>
> Btw, I use xemacs now does it has folding class and method capabilities?
Hi Pujo,
[Note: in replies, please make sure to put tutor@python.org in CC.]
According to:
http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.lang.python/msg/956f1c2d37f93995?
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Pujo Aji wrote:
> I tried this code in emacs.
> for i in range(3):
> time.sleep(1)
> print i
>
> It shows the result but total result not second per second.
Hi Pujo,
In Emacs, you may want to first start up a Python subprocess by using the
keystroke:
C-c !
and t
On Jun 14, 2005, at 23:17, Pujo Aji wrote:
> I just use Ctrl+C Ctrl+C to run the code.
> The code wait for 3 second and show all i all together.
>
> I can't feel every second pass.
>
> pujo
Try running your script from a terminal (outside of emacs, that
is).
-- Max
maxnoel_fr at yahoo do
On Jun 14, 2005, at 22:56, Pujo Aji wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried this code in emacs.
> for i in range(3):
> time.sleep(1)
> print i
>
> It shows the result but total result not second per second.
>
> Any one experiance this problem
>
> pujo
Works for me... How do you run it? Do you use a
Hello,
I tried this code in emacs.
for i in range(3):
time.sleep(1)
print i
It shows the result but total result not second per second.
Any one experiance this problem
pujo
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
13 matches
Mail list logo
