>>
>> I do not think any of these meet the criteria for inheritance. None of
>> them "is a" kind of any of the others.
>>
I refreshed on my OO terminology and I see your point -- that
composition is a more appropriate fit here than inheritance.
>> I don;t like the use of Filing for a class name,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
> "Serdar Tumgoren" wrote
>
>> Aha, okay, the multiple classes approach makes sense. But would these
>> be nested classes,
>>
>
> No although they would probably have attributes containing
> the related lists. Thus Race might have a list of Cand
"Serdar Tumgoren" wrote
Aha, okay, the multiple classes approach makes sense. But would these
be nested classes,
No although they would probably have attributes containing
the related lists. Thus Race might have a list of Candidates.
And Candidate would have a list of Committees etc.
perh