>
>
>
>> In my continuing quest the find the best way of doing this I came across
>> the following method:
>>
>> for thread in threading.enumerate():
>> if thread is not threading.currentThread():
>> thread.join()
>> print 'FINISHED'
>>
>> In my newbie understanding, you
>
>
>> Only really glanced at this, but you seem to be checking only the last
>>> thread *after* the loop? Surely you should be storing all the threads in a
>>> list (or someplace) as you create them, and then check them all for liveness
>>> and if so join them each in turn, to ensure you only pri
> Only really glanced at this, but you seem to be checking only the last
>> thread *after* the loop? Surely you should be storing all the threads in a
>> list (or someplace) as you create them, and then check them all for liveness
>> and if so join them each in turn, to ensure you only print 'FINI
>
> Only really glanced at this, but you seem to be checking only the last
> thread *after* the loop? Surely you should be storing all the threads in a
> list (or someplace) as you create them, and then check them all for liveness
> and if so join them each in turn, to ensure you only print 'FINIS
Hi tutors!
I'm not a hard-core programmer but have used Python in systems
administration (it makes sense to me to use a scripting language which
supports both Windows and Unix).
The code below is an excerpt from a module I have written to collect
information about hosts on my network and populate
