Michael Bernhard Arp Sørensen wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I've been reading in books and homepages about threads. Apparently,
> "threading" is better than "thread", right?
>
> I've been trying to write a simple proof of concept code using
> "treading" inside a class. It was easely done with "thread"
Hi there.
I've been reading in books and homepages about threads. Apparently,
"threading" is better than "thread", right?
I've been trying to write a simple proof of concept code using "treading"
inside a class. It was easely done with "thread", but it was a lot harder
with "threading". I want to
