Re: [Tutor] Top Programming Languages of 2013

2007-10-08 Thread Michael
I'd guess that by 2013 we'll be using a slightly more graceful, but still horribly wrong (and unsupported by IE 7.666), redo of HTML, CSS, Javascript, Flash, and Java with a poorly conceived back-end marriage of PHP + MySQL or some horrible Microsoft technology for most apps. I'll also venture that

Re: [Tutor] Top Programming Languages of 2013

2007-10-07 Thread James Matthews
What are these stats based on? On 10/7/07, Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Dick Moores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > > > > > Interesting, but I'm not sure what the criteria for "top" is. > Is it a measure of power, popularity, usage? >

[Tutor] Top Programming Languages of 2013

2007-10-07 Thread Adam Bark
On 07/10/2007, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan Gauld wrote: > > "Dick Moores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > >> > >> > > > > Interesting, but I'm not sure what the criteria for "top" is. > > Is it a measure of power, popularity, usa

Re: [Tutor] Top Programming Languages of 2013

2007-10-07 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Alan Gauld wrote: > "Dick Moores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >> >> > > Interesting, but I'm not sure what the criteria for "top" is. > Is it a measure of power, popularity, usage? > > Scary that HTML/CSS should be so high though > given its not a

Re: [Tutor] Top Programming Languages of 2013

2007-10-07 Thread Alan Gauld
"Dick Moores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > Interesting, but I'm not sure what the criteria for "top" is. Is it a measure of power, popularity, usage? Scary that HTML/CSS should be so high though given its not a programming language at all! Ala

[Tutor] Top Programming Languages of 2013

2007-10-06 Thread Dick Moores
Dick Moores ___ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor