On 21/04/13 03:10, Jim Mooney wrote:
This is why we tend to recommend 2.7 for anyone doing serious work in
Python.
Understood. I am in no rush, but what do you think it the time frame
when Py 3 will be mature?
As Steven has already pointed out Python 3 itself is mature.
The problem i
On 21/04/13 12:10, Jim Mooney wrote:
This is why we tend to recommend 2.7 for anyone doing serious work in
Python.
Understood. I am in no rush, but what do you think it the time frame when
Py 3 will be mature? A year from now? Two years? At some point I might want
to use it more practically. O
> This is why we tend to recommend 2.7 for anyone doing serious work in
> Python.
>
Understood. I am in no rush, but what do you think it the time frame when
Py 3 will be mature? A year from now? Two years? At some point I might want
to use it more practically. Or maybe there will be huge inflatio
