On Sunday 05 July 2009, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Kent Johnson wrote:
> [..]
>
> > Why not just return the value from the function and pass it up
> > the call chain? If a call fails return None. Something like this:
>
> That's what I ended up doing but the first thing occurred to me and
> I was just
Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
Kent Johnson wrote:
[..]
Why not just return the value from the function and pass it up the
call chain? If a call fails return None. Something like this:
That's what I ended up doing but the first thing occurred to me and I
was just wondering if there's any production co
Kent Johnson wrote:
[..]
Why not just return the value from the function and pass it up the
call chain? If a call fails return None. Something like this:
That's what I ended up doing but the first thing occurred to me and I
was just wondering if there's any production code that relies on the
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Would it be considered unorthodox or 'wrong' in some sense for me to use an
> exception to unwind the stack and return to a caller for a recursive
> function?
>
> I need to do a depth first search and when I find the right
Hello everyone,
Would it be considered unorthodox or 'wrong' in some sense for me to use
an exception to unwind the stack and return to a caller for a recursive
function?
I need to do a depth first search and when I find the right element to
just stop the whole thing, and get back to the cal
