On 19 Jan 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have two lists:
>
> 1. Lseq:
>
len(Lseq)
> 30673
Lseq[20:25]
> ['NM_025164', 'NM_025164', 'NM_012384', 'NM_006380',
> 'NM_007032','NM_014332']
>
>
> 2. refseq:
len(refseq)
> 1080945
refseq[0:25]
> ['>gi|10047089|ref|NM_014332.1| Homo
Kumar,
You should look for a way to solve this with dictionaries or sets. If you look for each element of
Lseq in each element of refseq, that is 33,155,825,985 lookups. That is a lot!
Sets have a fast test for membership, look for ways to use them!
In this case, the target string in refseq seems
Hi kumar
If I unterstood your question correctly, you have to iterate over the refseq
until
you get the next entry, which starts with a '>'
on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:12:32 -0800 (PST) kumar s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
-
Dear group:
I have two lists:
1. Lseq:
>>> len(Lseq)
30673
>>> Lseq[20:25]
['NM_025164', 'NM_025164', 'NM_012384', 'NM_006380',
'NM_007032','NM_014332']
2. refseq:
>>> len(refseq)
1080945
>>> refseq[0:25]
['>gi|10047089|ref|NM_014332.1| Homo sapiens small
muscle protein, X-linked (SMPX), mRNA'
