Hello, John
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Fouhy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 6:56 PM
> To: Carroll, Barry
> Cc: tutor@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Ruby Code Blocks vs. Python Lambdas
>
> On
On 08/11/06, Carroll, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct indeed. But lambda functions ARE anonymous.
>
> "Python supports the creation of anonymous functions (i.e.
> functions that are not bound to a name) at runtime, using
> a construct called "lambda".
>
Hello again.
> -Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:56:42 -
> From: "Alan Gauld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Ruby Code Blocks vs. Python Lambdas
> To: tutor@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Ty
> -Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:20:16 +0100
> From: Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Ruby Code Blocks vs. Python Lambdas
> To: Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: tutor@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR
* Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061107 08:27]:
> Apropos of nothing at all...
>
> "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Carroll, Barry wrote:
> >> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby
> >
> > Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas.
>
> And Andreas, Danny a
Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 17:22 + schrieb Alan Gauld:
> Apropos of nothing at all...
>
> "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Carroll, Barry wrote:
> >> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby
> >
> > Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas.
>
> And Andr
Apropos of nothing at all...
"Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Carroll, Barry wrote:
>> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby
>
> Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas.
And Andreas, Danny and I also argued for Ruby.
And elsewhere Tim making a case for Rebo
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:20, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> That's bullshit. Python and Ruby are quite comparable
Gee Andreas tell us how you really feel! BTW I agree that Python and Ruby are
very close.
John
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
h
Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 09:56 + schrieb Alan Gauld:
> "Carroll, Barry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > Thank you for this post. I was in a discussion of Ruby vs. Python
> > at
> > lunch today. The consensus was that Python was much better than
> > Ruby in
> > all ways.
That's bullshi
Carroll, Barry wrote:
> Thank you for this post. I was in a discussion of Ruby vs. Python at
> lunch today. The consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby in
> all ways. Since I know very little about Ruby, I had nothing to add to
> the conversation.
Sounds like you had a table full
"Carroll, Barry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Thank you for this post. I was in a discussion of Ruby vs. Python
> at
> lunch today. The consensus was that Python was much better than
> Ruby in
> all ways.
That's a little hard on Ruby. There are many good features and several
of them are arguab
Danny:
> -Original Message-
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:28:30 -0800 (PST)
> From: Danny Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] (OT) Flame wars
> To: Chris Hengge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Tutor
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=f
12 matches
Mail list logo
