Kent Johnson wrote:
> Anup Rao wrote:
>> c> Also, does any python script that uses this module have to be
>> distributed under GPL , LGPL, or is the PSF license sufficient?
>> My preference would be the PSF but I am not sure if it is ok.
>
> The PSF itself discourages using the PSF license f
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Anup Rao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing an application that uses a python libary (a *.so file)
> generated using SWIG.
> This library makes direct system calls to the Linux kernel.
The Linux kernel is not actually licensed under the standard GPL. The
copy of the GPL Lin
Cool!
Do you know about rpath/conary? It may not be worth tons here, but
it is good for custom Linux distributions.
http://www.rpath.com/corp/
On 1/31/07, Anup Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
A minor correction in the URL
it is *http://sarovar.org/projects/pylinux/*
Sorry for
Anup Rao wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am writing an application that uses a python libary (a *.so file)
> generated using SWIG.
> This library makes direct system calls to the Linux kernel.
> This raises three questions.
>
> a> Does this mean that the library must be distributed under GPL terms?
I d
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:24 +0530
Anup Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing an application that uses a python libary (a *.so file)
> generated using SWIG.
> This library makes direct system calls to the Linux kernel.
> This raises three questions.
>
> a> Does this mean that
Hi,
I am writing an application that uses a python libary (a *.so file)
generated using SWIG.
This library makes direct system calls to the Linux kernel.
This raises three questions.
a> Does this mean that the library must be distributed under GPL terms?
b> Can I distribute it as LGPL?
c> A
