Dana Robinson wrote:
>
> Have the functions take large numbers of parameters.
>
> or
>
> Create an options class to pass the options around.
>
>
Pythonically, I heard the distinct scream of DICTIONAR in my head.
Hugo
___
Tutor maillist - Tut
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 12:34 +0100, Alan Gauld wrote:
> > Suppose you have a situation where you have a large number of command-line
> > options that you will parse with getopt. You want to keep track of these
> > as you move around in the code and do various things.
> >
> > Is it more Pythonic to:
> Suppose you have a situation where you have a large number of command-line
> options that you will parse with getopt. You want to keep track of these
> as you move around in the code and do various things.
>
> Is it more Pythonic to:
>
> Have the functions take large numbers of parameters.
>
> C
Dana Robinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Suppose you have a situation where you have a large number of command-line
> options that you will parse with getopt. You want to keep track of these
> as you move around in the code and do various things.
>
> Is it more Pythonic to:
>
> Have the functions take la
Hello,
Suppose you have a situation where you have a large number of command-line
options that you will parse with getopt. You want to keep track of these
as you move around in the code and do various things.
Is it more Pythonic to:
Have the functions take large numbers of parameters.
or
Crea
