t; > Python to begin with
> > >
> > > Message: 2
> > > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:44:54 +0100
> > > From: Eike Welk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: [Tutor] Python to C++
> > > To: tutor@python.org
> > > Message-ID:
n to begin with
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:44:54 +0100
> > From: Eike Welk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Tutor] Python to C++
> > To: tutor@python.org
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Typ
w.scipy.org/Weave
> >
> > But mixing C/C++ with Python sort of defeats the reasons for using
> > Python to begin with
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:44:54 +0100
> > From: Eike Welk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Tutor] Pyt
efeats the reasons for using
> Python to begin with
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:44:54 +0100
> From: Eike Welk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Python to C++
> To: tutor@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/pl
Another alternative is Weave
http://www.scipy.org/Weave
But mixing C/C++ with Python sort of defeats the reasons for using
Python to begin with
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:44:54 +0100
From: Eike Welk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Python to C++
To: tutor@python.org
Mess
On Friday 21 March 2008 23:37, Dinesh B Vadhia wrote:
> Thank-you for all the suggestions for converting to C/C++ which
> will be followed up.
>
> Can we interface Python to a C++ library and if so how?
>
> Dinesh
>
If you have only few classes / member functions Boost-Python is a good
solution.
Gauld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Python to C++
To: tutor@python.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
"Dinesh B Vadhia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Say because
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 18:52, Dinesh B Vadhia wrote:
> Say because of performance, you might want to re-write/convert Python code
> to C++. What is the best way (or best practice) to do this wrt the tools
> available?
>
> Dinesh
You also might want to use some profiling tools, or skip that st
"Dinesh B Vadhia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Say because of performance, you might want to re-write/convert
> Python code to C++. What is the best way (or best practice)
> to do this wrt the tools available?
It may be obvious but its worth noting that optimised Python may
be faster than a ba
If you need to rewrite Python code for performance, I'd recommend using
Pyrex/Cython. (www.cython.org).
It let's you get away with small changes to your code as a starter
(Cython is relative compatible syntax-wise with Python), and you can add
"C type annotations" as needed. (And no, C++ is not co
Weave is probably what you really want to do, although it doesn't do
what you said: http://wiki.python.org/moin/weave
Pyrex actually does what you said: http://wiki.python.org/moin/Pyrex
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Dinesh B Vadhia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Say because of performance, y
Say because of performance, you might want to re-write/convert Python code to
C++. What is the best way (or best practice) to do this wrt the tools
available?
Dinesh
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>Is there any way to convert a program in .py to .c? other then remakeing
> the program?
Thee are a couuple of projects designed to make Python run faster which
try to convert Python to something like C and compile it but its not a
general
solution and the C produced isn't in any way readable.
I
Is there any way to convert a program in .py to .c? other then remakeing the program?Eli Zabielski
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
14 matches
Mail list logo
