Hello,
I jump on the opportunity offered by the previous thread to tell a little story
(serious only people disgard). Guess this is a candidate for Bug of the Year.
I was filtering (parse) results to keep only nodes from a given set of types:
for child in node:
if child.pattern in item_type
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:56:40 +1200 (NZST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fine, but always test the simplified version, unless you're
> absolutely certain what you're throwing out!
Point taken.
> When you do 'A + [4, 5, 6]', python first calls
> A.__getattr__('__coerce__').
Everything's working fine
Quoting Kevin Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:14:21 +1200
> John Fouhy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you sure you've giving us all the code?
> No, I was trying to keep it simple. Anyway, here it is,
Fine, but always test the simplified version, unless you're absolutely c
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:14:21 +1200
John Fouhy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure you've giving us all the code?
No, I was trying to keep it simple. Anyway, here it is,
class MyList:
def __init__(self, start):
self.wrapped = [ ]
for x in start: self.wrapped.append(x)
Kevin Reeder wrote:
This is not my code but is taken from the book I'm working with. My
problem is that whenever I call to the __add__ method the counters
increase by 2 while calls the __len__ method increase the counters
by 1 as expected.
Well, I can't duplicate your results.. I get the behaviou
Following an example from a book, I'm getting an unexpected outcome.
The point of exercise is to extend operator overloading methods from
a superclass and track the method calls. Here's the code,
class MyList:
def __init__(self, start):
self.wrapped = [ ]
for x in start: self.w
