Kent Johnson wrote:
> Dave Kuhlman wrote:
>
>> I thought xrange() returned an iterator. I was wrong.
>>
>> Actually xrange() returns an xrange object which, according to the
>> docs, is "an opaque sequence".
>>
>
> Interesting. So an xrange object is an iterable sequence, not an iterator.
Dave Kuhlman wrote:
> I thought xrange() returned an iterator. I was wrong.
>
> Actually xrange() returns an xrange object which, according to the
> docs, is "an opaque sequence".
Interesting. So an xrange object is an iterable sequence, not an iterator.
Kent
___
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:52:16AM -0400, Kent Johnson wrote:
Kent and Alan -
Thanks for encouraging me to do a little reading and experimenting.
I thought xrange() returned an iterator. I was wrong.
Actually xrange() returns an xrange object which, according to the
docs, is "an opaque sequenc
Alan Gauld wrote:
> "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
>> possible = set(xrange(4, 1000, 4)).intersection(xrange(5, 1000, 5))
>> \
>> .intersection(xrange(6, 1000, 6))
>>
>
> Kent,
>
> I've noticed in a few of your replie recemntly you have been using
> xrange rather than ra
"Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> possible = set(xrange(4, 1000, 4)).intersection(xrange(5, 1000, 5))
> \
> .intersection(xrange(6, 1000, 6))
>
Kent,
I've noticed in a few of your replie recemntly you have been using
xrange rather than range. I was under the impression that
