All right! That's penetrated. Thanks very much.
ds
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
> I'm not sure what language you've dealt with before, but if it was Java or
> C++, then you've run into Python's variant of static members.
>
> class X(object):
>classMember = True
>
>def __init__(self):
>self.instanceMember = True
>
>
> Does that make it any clearer? As to the why
>I had thought I was developing a clue regarding objects in Python, but I
> ran across an oddity today that I didn't expect. It had seemed to me
> that once an instance was created, it would have a separate data pool
> from any other instance of the same object.
And this is true...
> It would sh
On 07/11/05, DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I can see the error of my ways. I can also see that this behavior
> gives me an opportunity to globally change a value in all of the object
> instances, if I ever had to do something like that. I just don't have a
> clue as to why objects were desi
earer? As to the why, I'd ask Guido Van Rossum. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of DS
Sent: Monday, 7 November 2005 1:20 p.m.
To: tutor@python.org
Subject: [Tutor] Object instances
I had thought I was developing a clue regarding obj
I had thought I was developing a clue regarding objects in Python, but I
ran across an oddity today that I didn't expect. It had seemed to me
that once an instance was created, it would have a separate data pool
from any other instance of the same object. It would share methods, of
course, but th