On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no need to include both the flac file name and the mp3 file
> name if the roots match. You can use os.path functions to split the
> extension or the quick-and-dirty way:
> mp3file = flacfile.rsplit('.', 1)[0] + '.mp
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Damon Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I did it! Woo hoo! (cheers all around! drinks on me!)
Cool! Where are we meeting for drinks? ;-)
> flacFiles = [["test.flac","test.mp3"],["test2.flac","test2.mp3"],\
>["test3.flac","test3.mp3"],["test4.flac
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A function as mentioned above would help. For the threaded solution
> the function could just start the child process and wait for it to
> finish, it doesn't have to return anything. Each thread will block on
> its associate
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Damon Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Martin Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here is my simplistic, not-very-well-thought-out, attempt in
>> pseudo-code, perhaps it will get you started ...
>>
>> paths = ["file1.flac","file2.fl
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Martin Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not certain this completely explains the poor performance, if at
> all, but the communicate method of Popen objects will wait until EOF is
> reached and the process ends. So IIUC, in your example the process 'p'
> runs t
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Damon Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last piece of my puzzle though, I am having trouble wrapping my
> head around ... I will have a list of files
> ["file1.flac","file2.flac","file3.flac","etc"] and I want the program
> to tackle compressing two at a time .
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:43:11 -0500, Damon Timm wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Python Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I'm on my phone so excuse the simple reply. From what I skimmed you are
>> wrapping shell commands which is what I do all the time. Some hints. 1)
>> look into pope
Damon Timm wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Python Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm on my phone so excuse the simple reply.
>> From what I skimmed you are wrapping shell commands which is what I do
>> all the time. Some hints. 1) look into popen or subprocess in place of
>> execute
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Python Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm on my phone so excuse the simple reply.
> From what I skimmed you are wrapping shell commands which is what I do
> all the time. Some hints. 1) look into popen or subprocess in place of
> execute for more flexibility. I
Hi Everyone - I am a complete and utter Python newbie (as of today,
honestly) -- am interested in expanding my programming horizons beyond
bash scripting and thought Python would be a nice match for me.
To start, I thought I may try re-writing some of my bash scripts in
Python as a learning tool f
10 matches
Mail list logo