Thanks for your answer and your workaround! There's always something to
learn about lambdas and variable scope in Python ;)
I'm sorry I didn't delete the quoted Tutor Digest part, it was a stupid
mistake :(
cheers,
Michael
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor
Michael Meier wrote:
> Hello
>
> I ran the following code in python:
>
ls = [(lambda op: op + i) for i in [1,2,3]]
ls
> [ at 0xb7de4cdc>, at 0xb7de4d14>,
> at 0xb7de4d4c>]
for l in ls:
> ... print l(5)
> ...
> 8
> 8
> 8
>
>
> I am quite surprised of the result. I'
Hello
I ran the following code in python:
>>> ls = [(lambda op: op + i) for i in [1,2,3]]
>>> ls
[ at 0xb7de4cdc>, at 0xb7de4d14>,
at 0xb7de4d4c>]
>>> for l in ls:
... print l(5)
...
8
8
8
>>>
I am quite surprised of the result. I'm generating three lamdas. What I
want to do is that
