Robert Berman wrote:
Thank you, Christian. This solution was one I was not expecting and am
glad to receive it. It is one I will explore in greater detail later.
Robert
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 16:44 +0200, Christian Witts wrote:
Robert Berman wrote:
Hi,
Given a list of options: optio
> understand exactly what you are saying and what you are advocating.
> The 'dictionary of functions' is the 'best' approach because of simplicity
> and because it minimizes chances or errors.
Correct. Maintaining synch of indexes between two arrays of data items
is always going to be a risky b
Le Wed, 20 May 2009 10:25:21 -0400,
Robert Berman s'exprima ainsi:
> What I do not know how to do is to call the selected function.
If you have options and functions "hard-coded" in lists (or if you get them
from outside), you can still let python build a dict for you, using "zip":
l1 = [1,2,3
Alan,
The emphasis of your reply certainly makes me look at the dictionary
solution as the most 'correct' solution to utilize. Before I change the
code I just implemented, let me make sure I understand exactly what you
are saying and what you are advocating. The 'dictionary of functions' is
the 'b
"Robert Berman" wrote
Thank you, Christian. This solution was one I was not expecting and am
glad to receive it. It is one I will explore in greater detail later.
A dictionary of functions is the most common way to tackle
this fairly common requirement. It combines readability with
ease of
Thank you, Christian. This solution was one I was not expecting and am
glad to receive it. It is one I will explore in greater detail later.
Robert
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 16:44 +0200, Christian Witts wrote:
> Robert Berman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given a list of options: option_1...option_n. F
Thank you, Emile.
That is the exact answer I needed.
Robert
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 07:48 -0700, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 5/20/2009 7:25 AM Robert Berman said...
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given a list of options: option_1...option_n. For each option I have
> > a corresponding function: func_1...
On 5/20/2009 7:25 AM Robert Berman said...
Hi,
Given a list of options: option_1...option_n. For each option I have
a corresponding function: func_1. func_n. I have all function names
defined in a list similar to flist = [func_1, func_2,...func_n]
which I know is a legitimate constru
Robert Berman wrote:
Hi,
Given a list of options: option_1...option_n. For each option I have
a corresponding function: func_1. func_n. I have all function names
defined in a list similar to flist = [func_1, func_2,...func_n]
which I know is a legitimate construct having found a simi
Robert Berman wrote:
Hi,
Given a list of options: option_1...option_n. For each option I have
a corresponding function: func_1. func_n. I have all function names
defined in a list similar to flist = [func_1, func_2,...func_n]
which I know is a legitimate construct having found a simi
Hi,
Given a list of options: option_1...option_n. For each option I have
a corresponding function: func_1. func_n. I have all function names
defined in a list similar to flist = [func_1, func_2,...func_n]
which I know is a legitimate construct having found a similar construct
discusse
11 matches
Mail list logo
