Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-23 Thread Steven D'Aprano
Alan Gauld wrote: Apart from trolling the list what do you hope to gain from this post? Be fair -- there's no evidence that Ashish Gaonker was insincere about his question or trying to stir up trouble. It is a very common misapprehension that "language Foo is faster than language Bar", and

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-23 Thread Alan Gauld
On 19/09/11 14:27, Ashish Gaonker wrote: First, to address the question in your subject line, we need to agree a definition of "better". In what respect? And by which benchmark? And who claimed that either one was "better" anyway? No serious programmer would be likely to make such a vague compa

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-22 Thread Steven D'Aprano
Mac Ryan wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:27:12 +1000 Steven D'Aprano wrote: There are three misunderstandings with that statement. [snip] There's also JPype, which claims to give full access to Java libraries in Python. Now: this was one of the best write-ups on the subject I read. Concise, c

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-20 Thread Wayne Werner
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Mac Ryan wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:27:12 +1000 > Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > > > There are three misunderstandings with that statement. > > [snip] > > There's also JPype, which claims to give full access to Java > > libraries in Python. > > Now: this was one

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-20 Thread Mac Ryan
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:27:12 +1000 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > There are three misunderstandings with that statement. > [snip] > There's also JPype, which claims to give full access to Java > libraries in Python. Now: this was one of the best write-ups on the subject I read. Concise, clear, docume

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-19 Thread Steven D'Aprano
Ashish Gaonker wrote: My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then a interpreted language. There are three misunderstandings with that statement. Firstly: Languages are neither "compiled" or "interpreted". Languages are syntax and grammar. Implementations ar

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-19 Thread Walter Prins
Hi Ashish, On 19 September 2011 14:27, Ashish Gaonker wrote: > My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then > a interpreted language. > > I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn + python > is expressive. > > Can you share some more espe

Re: [Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-19 Thread Christian Witts
On 2011/09/19 03:27 PM, Ashish Gaonker wrote: My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then a interpreted language. I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn + python is expressive. Can you share some more especially as compared to Jav

[Tutor] How it is better than java

2011-09-19 Thread Ashish Gaonker
My obvious thinking is : Java being compiled language , must be faster then a interpreted language. I know couple of points : Development time is less + easy to learn + python is expressive. Can you share some more especially as compared to Java / .net (two primarily used languages in enterpris