2017-02-05 9:36 GMT+01:00 Steven D'Aprano :
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 10:11:39PM -0600, boB Stepp wrote:
>
> > Are the people making linters implementing checking function
> > annotations? Or is this something only gradually being adopted?
>
> Depends which linter :-)
>
> MyPy is still the refere
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 10:11:39PM -0600, boB Stepp wrote:
> Are the people making linters implementing checking function
> annotations? Or is this something only gradually being adopted?
Depends which linter :-)
MyPy is still the reference implementation for type hinting in Python:
http://myp
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 08:50:00PM -0600, boB Stepp wrote:
>> Of course, these are
>> apparently optional. I now wonder if I should be endeavoring to add
>> these to my code?
>
> Do you run a linter? If not, there doesn't seem much point i
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 08:50:00PM -0600, boB Stepp wrote:
> I just finished looking at
> https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/controlflow.html#function-annotations
> and skimming through PEP 484--Type Hints
> (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/). My initial impression is
> that the purpose o
I just finished looking at
https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/controlflow.html#function-annotations
and skimming through PEP 484--Type Hints
(https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/). My initial impression is
that the purpose of function annotations is to enable static code
analysis tools like l
