[Angus Rodgers]
> ...
> If I started to agitate for changes to a marginal and little-used
> feature of the language within days of starting to learn it, might
> I not quickly earn a reputation as a crank? 8-P
If that's your /goal/, it would be easier to rant about some imagined
flaw in the ring o
>Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:25:13 +1000
>From: Lie Ryan
>Message-ID:
>
>Angus Rodgers wrote:
>
>> I /think/ I would be naturally inclined to define:
>>
>> floor(x + yj) = floor(x) + floor(y)j for all real x, y
>>
>> z % w = z - floor(z / w) * wfor all complex z, w (!= 0)
>
>I'm not a m
Angus Rodgers wrote:
> I'm a little confused by: (i) the definition of the modulus and
> floor division functions for complex arguments; (ii) the fact
> that these functions for complex arguments are now "deprecated";
> and (iii) the fact that the math.floor() function is not defined
> at all for
[Angus Rodgers]
> I'm a little confused by: (i) the definition of the modulus and
> floor division functions for complex arguments;
Perhaps you're confused by the current definitions simply because they
don't make good sense.
> (ii) the fact that these functions for complex arguments are
> now "
I'm a little confused by: (i) the definition of the modulus and
floor division functions for complex arguments; (ii) the fact
that these functions for complex arguments are now "deprecated";
and (iii) the fact that the math.floor() function is not defined
at all for a complex argument.
If I were
