Darth Kaboda wrote:
Good point. It is important to state your goal for the code, preferably
in comments in your code, as well as in the message asking us the
question. Suggest you include a doc-string for each class and method
declaration.
But it's important to tell us how you expect to use i
> Good point. It is important to state your goal for the code, preferably
> in comments in your code, as well as in the message asking us the
> question. Suggest you include a doc-string for each class and method
> declaration.
>
> But it's important to tell us how you expect to use it, as wel
"Dave Angel" wrote
len() is very fast, so there's no need for a separate variable to keep
track of the lengths of inpile1 and inpile2. So eliminate all refs to
pile1c and pile2. In the while, just use
while len(inpile1) and len(inpile2):
Or even simpler:
while inpile1 and inpile2:
Darth Kaboda wrote:
Subject: Re: [Tutor] First code snipet
From: andr...@kostyrka.org
To: darthkab...@msn.com
CC: tutor@python.org
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:02:27 +0200
Some things:
1) It's Python, not Phython.
2) Slightly shorter solution to your problem:
import random
input =
"Darth Kaboda" wrote
The one worry I have is not coding things the Phython way
...So would like to have people look at a simplistic class
rpile = pile1[0:0] #get blank copy of the passed in object types.
This will return an empty list regardless of the type of passed in object.
T
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Darth Kaboda wrote:
> I'm starting to learn Python as it seems to be adopted by many companies
> that I've been looking to apply to. I used the book Learning Phython to get
> the basics of the language and many of the gotcha's. I think I know enough
> of the basi
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] First code snipet
> From: andr...@kostyrka.org
> To: darthkab...@msn.com
> CC: tutor@python.org
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:02:27 +0200
>
> Some things:
>
> 1) It's Python, not Phython.
> 2) Slightly shorter solution to your pro
Some things:
1) It's Python, not Phython.
2) Slightly shorter solution to your problem:
import random
input = range(53)
random.shuffle(input)
print input
3) The important part here is that reimplementing something that is in
the standard library does not make sense usually.
4) A more sensible
I'm starting to learn Python as it seems to be adopted by many companies that
I've been looking to apply to. I used the book Learning Phython to get the
basics of the language and many of the gotcha's. I think I know enough of the
basic features of the language to start playing around and can u
