On 01/17/10 16:42, Robert wrote:
> I have read quite a bit in the past 2 months, ( I have also looked at codes)
> At this point, I think I understand well what __init__() is and does -
> But, I have yet to see this *specifically* spelled out about the the
> __init__ method for a Class;
>
> It is O
I have read quite a bit in the past 2 months, ( I have also looked at codes)
At this point, I think I understand well what __init__() is and does -
But, I have yet to see this *specifically* spelled out about the the
__init__ method for a Class;
It is OPTIONAL, correct ?
if I have NO start values
"Robert" wrote
I have read quite a bit in the past 2 months, ( I have also looked at
codes)
At this point, I think I understand well what __init__() is and does -
But, I have yet to see this *specifically* spelled out about the the
__init__ method for a Class;
It is OPTIONAL, correct ?
Yes
Robert wrote:
> I have read quite a bit in the past 2 months, ( I have also looked at codes)
> At this point, I think I understand well what __init__() is and does -
> But, I have yet to see this *specifically* spelled out about the the
> __init__ method for a Class;
>
> It is OPTIONAL, correct ?
I have read quite a bit in the past 2 months, ( I have also looked at codes)
At this point, I think I understand well what __init__() is and does -
But, I have yet to see this *specifically* spelled out about the the
__init__ method for a Class;
It is OPTIONAL, correct ?
if I have NO start values
