Hey Spir!
Maybe you should read the book "Design Patterns" from Erich Gamma and
the rest of "the gang of four". (A.T.Hofkamp, mentioning its
terminology, got me thinking.) You ask complicated questions that
normal newbies don't ask, so you should maybe read an advanced book.
The book's idea is
Thank you for this relevant & precise review, Albert. I will answer
specific topic, then give a overall introduction of the problem(s)
adressed by this project, that may clarify a bit some topics.
A.T.Hofkamp a écrit :
> However, by moving the 'type' information to a seperate object, your
spir wrote:
After reading your mail, I cannot help wondering that something
crucial seems to be missing in your class structure. (I get the
impression that you are trying to squeeze object information and object
meta information together in one class definition.)
Yes. This is a consequence of
[forwarded, only A.T.Hofkamp got this answer]
A.T.Hofkamp a écrit :
spir wrote:
Q: Is there a way to write /type/ (class) functions, meaning methods
not bound to an instance, in python?
As Bob Gailer already said, staticmethod seems to do what you want.
Thank you for you answers about static
