Hello Ruben,
You might already know this, but the Python documentation will get you
pretty far: http://www.python.org/doc/
Here are some things to lookup that may help you solve the problems.
On 10/16/2013 08:49 PM, Pinedo, Ruben A wrote:
I was given this code and I need to modify it so that
reader:
> 6. d[badge]=name
> 7. return d
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
_
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>
>
--
Todd Matsumoto
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>
>
--
Todd Matsumoto
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
ranteed to give either head or tails. So just count the
> number of heads, then the number of tails will be ten less the number of
> heads.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Steven
>
> __**_
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
I don't understand how the while loop efficiently tests if the list is empty.
Why would going through the entire list be a good test to simply see find out
if the list is empty or not.
Wouldn't you want to test the list itself, rather than the contents of it?
Cheers,
T
Original-Nachr
The while loop will print each index of the list. In a way it checks that if
the list is empty by printing the items. As far as I know there isn't any
'True' or 'False' output from a list.
If you want to do something if mylist is empty you can check it like this:
if not mylist:
... do someth
Hello Tutors,
I'm building a script that now needs a command line interface.
I'm aware of optparse, but I'm wondering if there are any other tools that may
be better for building the interface.
Cheers,
T
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http:
Thanks guys,
In the example the __call__ method has *args and **kws as arguments. Is that
required?
Also when, in what situation would you use callable objects?
Cheers,
T
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:02:05 -0700
> Von: wesley chun
> An: vince spicer , tmat
hi kent,
thanks, i read through the link but still haven't got my head around this
concept.
will read on.
cheers,
t
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:33:33 -0400
> Von: Kent Johnson
> An: Todd Matsumoto
> CC: tutor@python.org
> Betreff: Re
Hi,
Can some one give, or point to some good examples of how @decorators work, and
__call__ (able) objects? I'm having trouble getting my head around these
techniques (concepts).
Cheers,
T
--
Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate
für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal
ve a value that is a Decimal object something is wrong.
Cheers,
T
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:36:14 -0400
> Von: Dave Angel
> An:
> CC: Todd Matsumoto , tutor@python.org
> Betreff: Re: Re: [Tutor] unittests, testing a type
> On Tue, J
his test-driven development thing.
Cheers,
T
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:45:18 +0200
> Von: "A.T.Hofkamp"
> An: Todd Matsumoto
> CC: "tutor@python.org"
> Betreff: Re: [Tutor] unittests, testing a type
> Todd Matsumoto
Hi,
Does anyone know how to do a unittest assert for a type?
So If you have a program returning a Decimal, lets say Decimal("1"), and you
want to make sure that what is returned is a Decimal object.
At first I thought of importing Decimal and making my own Decimal("1") and
doing an assertEqua
Okay,
Thanks guys.
That explains it.
Cheers,
T
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:16:30 -0700
> Von: wesley chun
> An: "A.T.Hofkamp"
> CC: Todd Matsumoto , "tutor@python.org"
> Betreff: Re: [Tutor] While and for loops
> &
else:
if break is False:
break
Is the above do-able? Is there a better way?
T
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:05:30 -0700
> Von: wesley chun
> An: Todd Matsumoto
> CC: tutor@python.org
> Betreff: Re: [Tutor] While and for loops
>
Okay,
So how would you break out from this situation?
T
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:57:41 +
> Von: sli1...@yahoo.com
> An: "Todd Matsumoto"
> Betreff: Re: [Tutor] While and for loops
> Your break is for the for loop not the
Hello,
The other day I needed to pack a dictionary, the value of each key was a list.
In the code I was packing the list and the dictionary at the same time. First I
tried something like this:
list = []
dict = {}
x = 1
dict['int'] = list.append(x)
The result was {'int': None}. Why is the valu
Hello,
The other day I was playing with a while loop with a for loop nested inside.
Within the for loop I had a condition to break the loop, but when loop ran it
never existed the loop. I went back and looked in Programming Python to read
about loops and I've got two questions (related to each
19 matches
Mail list logo
