Re: [Tutor] Are you allowed to shoot camels? [kinda OT]

2005-02-03 Thread Nicholas . Montpetit
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Btw, I'm skeptical that the code below does what you want it to do.  :-) > >   > > that was kind of my point. In python I just type the obvious and it > works. In Perl I have to muck with references, slashes, arrows and the > like. Every time I have ha

RE: [Tutor] Are you allowed to shoot camels? [kinda OT]

2005-02-03 Thread Nicholas . Montpetit
Hi Jeff, > Well put.  I come from a physics FORTRAN background and when I > decided to learn C and start using it I heard the same arguments: > it's too hard to read. >   > It's a silly argument to use against a language.  It's like an > English-only speaker claiming he won't learn Greek becau

Re: [Tutor] Are you allowed to shoot camels? [kinda OT]

2005-02-03 Thread Nicholas . Montpetit
> (I am an ex-perler gone clean. Been straight for 5 years now with only > the occasional work forced binges.) > > Perl was designed by a linguist. He wanted it to act like human language > -- which is not very consistent. And from what I gather, quite effective.  :-)   > Personally, the thin

Re: [Tutor] Are you allowed to shoot camels? [kinda OT]

2005-02-03 Thread Nicholas . Montpetit
gt; The first will open index.htm with the handle OUTFILE, to read... > The second will open index.htm with the handle OUTFILE to write!. So?  That's the syntax of the language. I don't know why that would be bothersome...   > Of course, the documentation