not a language level feature, it becomes a
convention that one can only rely on in ones own code.
regards,
Bill
On Feb 4, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Alex Hall wrote:
> On 2/4/11, Bill Felton wrote:
>> Um, yes, emphatically yes. You missed the context, which was Smalltalk, and
>> it is te
, at 9:28 AM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 2/4/2011 5:35 AM Bill Felton said...
>
>> Um, not quite correct -- methods *without a specified return value* always
>> return self, that is, the object which executed the method.
>
> Um, no. They return None.
>
> >&g
On Feb 4, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Alex Hall wrote:
> On 2/4/11, Alan Gauld wrote:
>> "Alex Hall" wrote
>>
>>> I am wondering what the best way to do the following would be: throw
>>> an exception, or always return an object but set an error flag if
>>> something goes wrong? Here is an example:
>>
>
I haven't tried this on Windows 7 yet, but what I did on my Mac was to create
shortcuts and rename those. I generally launch from shortcuts, so this leaves
the app names alone but gives me the information I need to launch what I
intend. You should be able to do something similar on Windows.
r
On Jan 7, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Tommy Kaas wrote:
> I try to write a program, where the user can write a word or a name and I
> will tell how many times the subject was mentioned in a text, I’m hosting.
> I guess it’s possible but not this way it seems?
> The re is only searching for the word “name”
