On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:58 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mats Wichmann wrote:
>> On 09/12/2017 01:05 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
>>> As I continue to read about SQL, one thing jumps out: There are many
>>> differences between how SQL statements are implemented among the
>>>
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 09/12/2017 01:05 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
>> As I continue to read about SQL, one thing jumps out: There are many
>> differences between how SQL statements are implemented among the
>> different database products. Even for relatively simple,
(sorry for top posting)
There are various SQL abstraction layers for this. I have only used Sqlalchemy.
This package has two APIs: query and ORM. You might want to look at the query
API. This is closer to SQL than ORM. You can use straight(obj) to inspect the
SQL that's emitted
On 09/12/2017 01:05 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
> As I continue to read about SQL, one thing jumps out: There are many
> differences between how SQL statements are implemented among the
> different database products. Even for relatively simple,
> straightforward things like field concatenation. One DB
As I continue to read about SQL, one thing jumps out: There are many
differences between how SQL statements are implemented among the
different database products. Even for relatively simple,
straightforward things like field concatenation. One DB might use
"||" as the operator. Another uses "+"
