Wow. Thanks for those replies.
Those red error messages were several Exceptions and one PermissionError.
I THINK, but I'm not Positive that 3.6.1 is the only Python installed.
I'm the only person who uses this PC. ControlPanel > UserAccounts says I
am the Administrator.
I se
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> I dunno, to me it sounds like it *didn't* work, not if it is printing
> red error messages at the end. What do they say?
lxml should install from a wheel (e.g.
lxml-3.8.0-cp36-cp36m-win_amd64.whl). There's nothing to build, so the
most li
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:42:45AM -0700, Mark at information27.com wrote:
> On Windows7, SP1, 64-bit, I installed Python 3.6.1.
Are you positive this is the only Python installed?
What does
python -c "import sys; print(sys.version)"
do?
> Tried to run the Python pgm, and it said ModuleNotF
In most cases, my scripts tend to be pretty self-contained and written
for my own purposes, so that would rarely be an issue.
How would you hide main() if you _were_ concerned about it?
The "main" option would be to move the body of main() to a separate file,
which imports the original file as
Hi Mark
ModuleNotFoundError means the package is not installed.
Can you paste those red error message here? This can shed some light.
Sincerely
Ashfaq
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:10 AM Mark at information27.com <
m...@information27.com> wrote:
> First, I'm not a programmer, but I know a bit about p
First, I'm not a programmer, but I know a bit about programming techniques.
Had a Python pgm working about a year ago, and now trying to get it
running on a new machine.
On Windows7, SP1, 64-bit, I installed Python 3.6.1.
Tried to run the Python pgm, and it said ModuleNotFoundError: No module
n
* Mats Wichmann [2017-07-05 16:47]:
> >
>
> As a vaguely contradictory position to a part of this (which I in the
> main agree with): if your objective is to make a module, and also have
> some code (perhaps including test code) which is run in the non-module
> (aka not-imported) case, then stuf
On 07/05/2017 09:45 AM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, David Rock wrote:
>> I personally find using main() cumbersome, but many examples I come
>> across use main(). Is there some fundamental benefit to using main()
>> that I'm missing?
>
> In no particular order: testin
* Alan Gauld via Tutor [2017-07-05 20:36]:
> On 05/07/17 16:37, David Rock wrote:
>
> > This is a question about the benefits of using a main() function vs not.
>
>
> Others have answered for the pros, but I confess that I don't
> always use a main(), but only if all I'm doing is, say,
> instan
Ashfaq wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> The way you find the issue is really cool! Very cool! :)
Thanks ;)
Here's a bonus solution:
>>> import unittest
>>> class T(unittest.TestCase):
... def test_xy(self):
... self.maxDiff = None
... self.assertEqual(x, y)
...
>>> unittest.main()
F
==
On Jul 5, 2017 11:09 PM, "shubham goyal" wrote:
> Yha that's very smart. Only experience can drive you this way. Otherwise I
> was checking value by value.
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 PM, "Ashfaq" wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
> The way you find the issue is really cool! Very cool! :)
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 201
On 05/07/17 16:37, David Rock wrote:
> This is a question about the benefits of using a main() function vs not.
Others have answered for the pros, but I confess that I don't
always use a main(), but only if all I'm doing is, say,
instantiating a class and running a method. For anything
more comp
>> I personally find using main() cumbersome, but many examples I come
>> across use main(). Is there some fundamental benefit to using main()
>> that I'm missing?
>
> In no particular order: testing, encapsulation, and reusability. With
> a "main()" function (which, recall, can be named whatever
The difflib library (https://docs.python.org/2/library/difflib.html)
can also help with some exploratory discovery of the problem.
Here's an example:
>>> import difflib
>>> for line in difflib.context_diff(repr(x).split(','), repr(y).split(','
On 07/05/2017 11:09 AM, Marc Tompkins wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Ashfaq wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>> The way you find the issue is really cool! Very cool! :)
>>
>>
> I agree - that is very cool. But I have also made this sort of mistake a
> few times, and found it by using a very quick
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Ashfaq wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> The way you find the issue is really cool! Very cool! :)
>
>
I agree - that is very cool. But I have also made this sort of mistake a
few times, and found it by using a very quick, low-tech method...
"Unfold" the lines of the two dictio
Hi Peter,
The way you find the issue is really cool! Very cool! :)
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:10 PM, shubham goyal wrote:
> Thank you Peter.
> Silly mistakes 😀
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 5:10 PM, "Peter Otten" <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>
> > shubham goyal wrote:
> >
> > > null=None
> > > x={'_udp_options'
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, David Rock wrote:
> This is not a question about using if __name__ == '__main__':. I know
> what the difference is between running the script or importing it and
> using the value of __name__ to determine behavior.
>
> This is a question about the benefits of usin
This is not a question about using if __name__ == '__main__':. I know
what the difference is between running the script or importing it and
using the value of __name__ to determine behavior.
This is a question about the benefits of using a main() function vs not.
ie,
if __name__ == '__main__
Thank you Peter.
Silly mistakes 😀
On Jul 5, 2017 5:10 PM, "Peter Otten" <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> shubham goyal wrote:
>
> > null=None
> > x={'_udp_options': None, '_icmp_options': None, 'attribute_map':
> > {'icmp_options': 'icmpOptions', 'protocol': 'protocol', 'source':
> > {'source',
> > 't
shubham goyal wrote:
> null=None
> x={'_udp_options': None, '_icmp_options': None, 'attribute_map':
> {'icmp_options': 'icmpOptions', 'protocol': 'protocol', 'source':
> {'source',
> 'tcp_options': 'tcpOptions', 'is_stateless': 'isStateless', 'udp_options':
> 'udpOptions'}, '_is_stateless': False,
null=None
x={'_udp_options': None, '_icmp_options': None, 'attribute_map':
{'icmp_options': 'icmpOptions', 'protocol': 'protocol', 'source': 'source',
'tcp_options': 'tcpOptions', 'is_stateless': 'isStateless', 'udp_options':
'udpOptions'}, '_is_stateless': False, 'swagger_types': {'icmp_options':
22 matches
Mail list logo
