On 07/09/2015 12:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:16:16 +0100, Alan Gauld writes:
And of course if you are really moving to the v3 way of
doing things you should move to using the new string
formatti
This has turned into a very interesting discussion. Thank you to everyone
who's participating and sharing nuggets of information on 2 vs 3.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:01:00AM +0100, Alan Gauld wrote:
> > On 07/09/15 10:32, Laura Creighton
On 5 September 2015 at 23:28, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 05/09/2015 10:09, Peter Otten wrote:
>>
>>> the 5 lists above do not match my task insofar as every of the 5 lists
>>> contains 'a' and 'b' which should occur only once, hence my count of a
>>> maximum of 301 lists, which might nor be correc
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:01:00AM +0100, Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 07/09/15 10:32, Laura Creighton wrote:
> >In a message of Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:16:16 +0100, Alan Gauld writes:
> >
> >>And of course if you are really moving to the v3 way of
> >>doing things you should move to using the new string
> >
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:16:16 +0100, Alan Gauld writes:
>
> >And of course if you are really moving to the v3 way of
> >doing things you should move to using the new string
> >formatting style.
>
> I don't think there
On 07/09/15 10:32, Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:16:16 +0100, Alan Gauld writes:
And of course if you are really moving to the v3 way of
doing things you should move to using the new string
formatting style.
I don't think there is any great push to prefer the new
In a message of Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:16:16 +0100, Alan Gauld writes:
>And of course if you are really moving to the v3 way of
>doing things you should move to using the new string
>formatting style.
I don't think there is any great push to prefer the new style over
the old style 'just because' whe
On 07/09/15 01:40, Nym City via Tutor wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your response. I have made updates and here is the new code:
import csv
DomainList = []
domains = open('domainlist.csv', 'rb')
DomainList = csv.reader(domains)
DomainList = [column[1] for column in DomainList(str.rstrip('/'))]
S
On 07/09/15 02:15, Grady Martin wrote:
On 2015年09月05日 23時33分, Alan Gauld wrote:
Once you get used to it - and it is a big jump, don't
underestimate the learning time - v3 is superior.
This is the first I've heard someone describe the learning curve from 2
to 3 in anything but negligible terms.
In a message of Sun, 06 Sep 2015 21:15:52 -0400, Grady Martin writes:
>On 2015年09月05日 23時33分, Alan Gauld wrote:
>>Once you get used to it - and it is a big jump, don't
>>underestimate the learning time - v3 is superior.
>
>This is the first I've heard someone describe the learning curve from 2 to 3
Hello,
Thank you for your response. I have made updates and here is the new code:
import csv
DomainList = []
domains = open('domainlist.csv', 'rb')
DomainList = csv.reader(domains)
DomainList = [column[1] for column in DomainList(str.rstrip('/'))]
print(DomainList)
For "DomainList = [column[1] for
On 2015年09月05日 23時33分, Alan Gauld wrote:
Once you get used to it - and it is a big jump, don't
underestimate the learning time - v3 is superior.
This is the first I've heard someone describe the learning curve from 2 to 3 in
anything but negligible terms. What makes the jump big?
12 matches
Mail list logo
