On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:31:02PM +0200, Friedhelm Peters wrote:
>
> Sorry, I'm from Germany and my English isn't so good. By installing python
> 3.4.2 (64bit) I get the following error message:
>
> "There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program required
> for this install t
boB Stepp writes:
> In the programs I have been dabbling in at work, I am often
> "surprised" by the situations my users stumble into that I did not
> have sufficient imagination to consider up front.
This is a good thing to focus on. Improving the robustness of your code
is a matter of experien
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> boB Stepp writes:
>
[...]
>
>> I have so far been unable to find a list of these class/subclass
>> names.
>
> The standard library documentation's chapter on exceptions
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html> shows
> https://docs.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>
> > I have so far been unable to find a list of these class/subclass names. Of
> > course I can force an error to occur in the interpreter and see what comes
> > up for each type of error I wish to catch. Is there such a table or list?
> >
>
> H
Thank you all for the helpful criticism. I wish I was able to catch on to
what you are suggesting more quickly.
Based on your recommendations, I have come up with the following so far,
however I just dont see it as easily as I did while using the if/elif
statements.
This is what I have so far. I
On 24Oct2014 15:50, Ben Finney wrote:
Is this a hurdle for newcomers? Yes, and that's why the standard library
API documentation is not a tutorial. We have separate tutorial
documentation for that.
It's not a problem with the documentation of ‘signal.getsignal’ that it
doesn't have an exhaustiv
out = stdout.read()
if '3102EHD-Lanka-1108' in out:
s.exec_command('export DISPLAY=:0.0; cd /Downloads/Hourly/win.sh')
sftp = s.open_sftp()
sftp.get('/Downloads/Hourly/3102EHD-01108/3102EHD-01108.png',
'/Downloads/Hourly/3102EHD-01108.png')
sftp.close()
print
On 10/24/2014 08:01 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Alan Gauld schrieb am 24.10.2014 um 13:03:
>> Not all library modules are C based however so it doesn't
>> always apply. But they are usually optimised and thoroughly
>> debugged so it is still worth using them rather than building
>> your own.
>
> I
Bo Morris wrote:
> "...Regarding your program, instead of writing long sequences of
> repetitive if
> conditions, I would write one function for each of the different
> operations and store them in a dict, mapping each host name to a function
> (and multiple host names may map to the same function
"...Regarding your program, instead of writing long sequences of repetitive
if
conditions, I would write one function for each of the different operations
and store them in a dict, mapping each host name to a function (and
multiple host names may map to the same function). Then, look up the host
na
Dear Mr. and Mrs.,
Sorry, I'm from Germany and my English isn't so good. By installing python
3.4.2 (64bit) I get the following error message:
"There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program required
for this install the complete could not be run. Contact your support
p
Bo Morris schrieb am 24.10.2014 um 14:03:
> May I please get a little instructional criticism. The code below works. It
> logs into 9 different Linux computers, runs a couple commands, and then
> transfers a file back to the server. I want to become a better Python
> coder; therefore, I was hoping
Hello all,
May I please get a little instructional criticism. The code below works. It
logs into 9 different Linux computers, runs a couple commands, and then
transfers a file back to the server. I want to become a better Python
coder; therefore, I was hoping for some ways to make the below code b
Alan Gauld schrieb am 24.10.2014 um 13:03:
> Not all library modules are C based however so it doesn't
> always apply. But they are usually optimised and thoroughly
> debugged so it is still worth using them rather than building
> your own.
It's worth stressing this point a bit more. Lots of peopl
On 24/10/14 02:45, Adam Jensen wrote:
I'm tinkering this evening and I've noticed that math.factorial() is
much faster than my plain python implementations.
Is this kind of performance difference typical of the standard library
functions (compared to plain python user implementations)?
Yes,
I'm tinkering this evening and I've noticed that math.factorial() is
much faster than my plain python implementations.
import math
def factorial(n):
temp = 1
for k in range(0,n):
temp = temp * (n - k)
return(temp)
def fac(n):
r
16 matches
Mail list logo
