Dave Angel Wrote
in message:
> "Clayton Kirkwood" Wrote in message:
>>
>>
>> !-Original Message-
>> !From: Tutor [mailto:tutor-bounces+crk=godblessthe...@python.org] On
>> !Behalf Of Steven D'Aprano
> ...
>>
>> For clarification, a key only has one value which can be changed.
>
> No
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, eryksun wrote:
> from_buffer_copy is similar, accept instead of sharing the buffer
That should be ex-cept (conjunction for an exception clause), not
ac-cept (verb, to receive). I missed that in my initial proofread. It
takes a while to clear my mental buffer enoug
"Clayton Kirkwood" Wrote in message:
>
>
> !-Original Message-
> !From: Tutor [mailto:tutor-bounces+crk=godblessthe...@python.org] On
> !Behalf Of Steven D'Aprano
...
>
> For clarification, a key only has one value which can be changed.
No, because the key has to be immutable, like a
On 22/10/14 23:30, Juan Christian wrote:
The only thing left now is that the topics in this forum has a one/two
weeks lifespan, and I think Steam reuses the same ID for new topics that
was used in, lets say a 1 month-old topic
In that case I'd go back to using a primary key ID set by SQLite an
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Wilson, Pete wrote:
> I don't understand the line
> rx_buf = (c_uint8 * rx_buf_size).from_buffer_copy(string_buf)
A buffer is a block of memory used to pass data between functions,
processes, or systems. Specifically its use as a 'buffer' comes from
using a block
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Alan Gauld
wrote:
>
> Incidentally you don't need the semi-colon inside the execute. It can only
> execute the entire string so if there's only one command you
> don't need the terminator.
Ok, thanks!
Note that this makes no checks for unique ID so you put the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 6:02 PM CEST Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Bo Morris wrote:
>> hello all, hope everyone is doing well.
>>
>> The below code works, however I am going back and trying to enter the time
>> and date and I cant qui
On 22/10/14 18:38, Juan Christian wrote:
def ini_db():
db.execute('''
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TOPICS(
ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
URL VARCHAR NOT NULL,
AUTHOR VARCHAR NOT NULL,
MESSAGE VARCHAR NOT N
!-Original Message-
!From: Tutor [mailto:tutor-bounces+crk=godblessthe...@python.org] On
!Behalf Of Steven D'Aprano
!Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:40 AM
!To: tutor@python.org
!Subject: Re: [Tutor] A couple of somewhat esoteric questions
!
!On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0700, C
So guys, now I have this code that is fully working:
import sqlite3
db = sqlite3.connect('db.sqlite')
def ini_db():
db.execute('''
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TOPICS(
ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
URL VARCHAR NOT NULL,
AUTHOR VAR
On 22/10/14 16:06, Al Bull wrote:
I don't think I explained the problem properly. I have several hundred
thousand records in the ORD table. There are many instances of records with
identical ORD_DBASUB values. Where duplicates exist, I only want to keep
the most current record.
Ah, OK th
-Original Message-
From: Tutor [mailto:tutor-bounces+a.bull=pubdmgroup@python.org] On
Behalf Of Alan Gauld
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:42 PM
To: tutor@python.org
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Question on a select statement with ODBC
On 21/10/14 19:57, Al Bull wrote:
> have multiple reco
Just in case anyone else can benefit from this, here is my working code up
to this point
#!/usr/bin/python
import smtplib
from email.MIMEMultipart import MIMEMultipart
from email.MIMEText import MIMEText
from email.MIMEImage import MIMEImage
import time
strFrom = "HourlyReport.com"
strTo = "mye
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0700, Clayton Kirkwood wrote:
> As I've contemplated the usage of dictionaries, I face the question of
> efficiency. Going back before most of you were probably born;<)) if I
> remember correctly dictionaries(assoc. arrays), having hashes, are efficient
> for st
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Wilson, Pete wrote:
>
> ProcessIncomingSerialData_t = CFUNCTYPE(None, POINTER(c_uint8), c_uint16)
> process_incoming_serial_data = pt_dll.ProcessIncomingSerialData
> process_incoming_serial_data.argtypes = [ProcessIncomingSerialData_t]
ProcessIncomingSerialData ta
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:54:49PM -0700, Clayton Kirkwood wrote:
> col_position, code, description = 0, [], []
> key_name = raw_table.replace('\t','\n')
> for each_line in key_name.splitlines():
> if ':' in each_line:
>code[col_position], description.append() = each_line.split(':')
>
On 22/10/14 05:54, Clayton Kirkwood wrote:
__author__ = 'SYSTEM'
Its best not to invent your own dunder names.
You might run into a problem if a future Python release
decided to use the same name under the covers.
import string
Do you need this? Its very unusual these days
to use the string
On 22/10/14 00:54, Clayton Kirkwood wrote:
As I’ve contemplated the usage of dictionaries, I face the question of
efficiency.
Don;t worry about it. Python dictionaries are highly efficient and used
throughout the language. namespaces and classes are both effectively
dictionaries so every time
On 22/10/14 01:04, Wilson, Pete wrote:
The python code is below..
''' read_bat.py
'''
You are using triple quoted strings as a commenting feature.
Thats good practice where you want a docstring to appear in
the help() screen but its not so good for comments like the
above or where you are comm
__author__ = 'SYSTEM'
import string
#PricingDividends
raw_table = ('''
a: Asky: Dividend Yield
b: Bid d: Dividend per Share
b2: Ask (Realtime) r1: Dividend Pay Date
b3: Bid (Realtime)q: Ex-Dividend Date
p: Previous Close
o: Open
import re,
As I've contemplated the usage of dictionaries, I face the question of
efficiency. Going back before most of you were probably born;<)) if I
remember correctly dictionaries(assoc. arrays), having hashes, are efficient
for storing sparse arrays with the added benefit of hiding the traversal of
the d
I am having problems passing a pointer and uint8 to a .DLL. I have been
successful registering call -backs with this .DLL. So it is all 32-bit and
ctypes are working. Everything is working up to the line #set-up
ProcessingIncomingSerialData. I tried the direct approach and then morphing the
cal
22 matches
Mail list logo
