On 25/07/14 04:00, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
3.5 is a dev version. Not for production nor for learning python
one gets it by fetching from the repository and doing their own
compile.
Do you figure that many beginners to Python are doing that?
I think Dave was being a bit tongue in cheek.
H
> Python is only as secure as the code *you* write. If you write code
> where you accept text from untrusted people over the Internet and then
> execute it as code using eval() or exec(), then your code is vulnerable
> to code injection attacks. The solution to this is simple: don't use
> eval() or
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:11:41AM +, Allahondoum Mbaibarem wrote:
> I'm new at python and I would like to have knowledge about the Security and
> the Reliability factor of Python thank you.
Python is very reliable. The language has been around for over 20 years,
and is in use in tens of tho
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:25:59PM -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> Deb Wyatt Wrote in message:
> >> assuming you're using version 3.5
> >
> > How do you get version 3.5? Python.org shows 3.41 as being the latest.
>
> I could as easily figured 2.6. My point is that people need to
> specify what v
Deb Wyatt Wrote in message:
> assuming you're
>> using version 3.5
>>
>
> How do you get version 3.5? Python.org shows 3.41 as being the latest.
>
>
I could as easily figured 2.6. My point is that people need to
specify what version they're asking about.
3.5 is a dev version. Not for
assuming you're
> using version 3.5
>
How do you get version 3.5? Python.org shows 3.41 as being the latest.
Deb in WA, USA
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and
family!
Visit http://www.inbox.c
On Jul 24, 2014 3:21 PM, "Allahondoum Mbaibarem"
wrote:
>
> Please I would like to know about the Security and the Reliability of
Python.
This is somewhat outside the domain of python-tutor discussion. You may
want to contact the folks at:
http://www.pythonsecurity.org
instead.
___
Allahondoum Mbaibarem Wrote in message:
>
>
(use text messages here)
Python is no more secure than the code written in it.
It is very reliable, according to the experience of thousands of
users. Much of that comes from it being open-source; many eyes
catch the bugs faster than anything propr
Allahondoum Mbaibarem Wrote in message:
> ___
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
>
Post here using text messages, not html.
Wait 24 hours, not one, b
Glenn Lester Wrote in message:
>
?
You forgot to make your message a text one, and also omitted your
Python version. So I'll respond from memory, assuming you're
using version 3.5
The csv reader can make a dictionary from each line of the csv
file. So you can readily make a list o
On 7/24/2014 3:50 PM, Glenn Lester wrote:
I have been looking around for a way to read a comma delimited csv file
start with the csv module.
http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/module-csv.html
DESCRIPTION
This module provides classes that assist in the reading and writing
of Co
On 7/24/2014 3:11 AM, Allahondoum Mbaibarem wrote:
I'm new at python and I would like to have knowledge about the Security
and the Reliability factor of Python thank you.
That's a pretty open-ended question. It's as secure and reliable as
what you write. For most of us, it's as secure and r
I have been looking around for a way to read a comma delimited csv file and
then load it into a dictionary. So far any of my usual sources don't deal
with such simple stuff.
My current code is
# create a dictionary (dict) to store the order # and Remark
testVariables = {}
# Read the file an
I'm new at python and I would like to have knowledge about the Security and
the Reliability factor of Python thank you.
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
Please I would like to know about the Security and the Reliability of
Python. Thank you
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
On 24.07.2014 14:37, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
It’s recommended to switch to the [[ syntax anyways, some people
consider [ deprecated. Also, [ is actually /bin/[ while [[ lives in
your shell (and is therefore faster).
About the equals sign, == is the preferred syntax, and = is also
consi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Wolfgang Maier
wrote:
> On 24.07.2014 14:19, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
>>
>>
> python test.py
> if [ $? = 0 ]; then
> python second.py
> fi
>
> as your shell script.
The [ ] and = should be doubled.
>>>
>>>
>>
On 24.07.2014 14:19, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
python test.py
if [ $? = 0 ]; then
python second.py
fi
as your shell script.
The [ ] and = should be doubled.
?? why that ?
Double brackets can do more:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2188199/how-to-use-double-or-single-br
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Wolfgang Maier
wrote:
> On 24.07.2014 14:09, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Wolfgang Maier
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Try something like this (assuming bash):
>>>
>>> python test.py
>>> if [ $? = 0 ]; then
>>> python second.py
>
On 24.07.2014 14:09, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Wolfgang Maier
wrote:
Try something like this (assuming bash):
python test.py
if [ $? = 0 ]; then
python second.py
fi
as your shell script.
The [ ] and = should be doubled.
?? why that ?
But all th
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Wolfgang Maier
wrote:
> Try something like this (assuming bash):
>
> python test.py
> if [ $? = 0 ]; then
> python second.py
> fi
>
> as your shell script.
The [ ] and = should be doubled. But all this is not needed, all you need is:
python test.py && python
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:05:24PM +0530, jitendra gupta wrote:
> Hi All
>
> My shell script is not throwing any error when I am having some error in
> Python code.
This is a question about the shell, not about Python. I'm not an expert
on shell scripting, but I'll try to give an answer.
> ~~
On 24.07.2014 13:35, jitendra gupta wrote:
Hi All
My shell script is not throwing any error when I am having some error
in Python code.
test.py ~~
def main():
print "Test"
#some case error need to be thrown
raise Exception("Here is error")
if __name__ == "__main__"
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:35 PM, jitendra gupta wrote:
> Hi All
>
> My shell script is not throwing any error when I am having some error in
> Python code.
>
> In this case, I dont want to run my second.py
> Even I am throwing error from my test.py, but still second.py is getting
> executed, whic
Hi All
My shell script is not throwing any error when I am having some error in
Python code.
test.py ~~
def main():
print "Test"
#some case error need to be thrown
raise Exception("Here is error")
if __name__ == "__main__"
main()
~~
second.py ~~
def
25 matches
Mail list logo
