On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jim Mooney wrote:
> If I'm using a variable-dependent range in a for loop, is Python smart
> enough to figure the variable once so I don't have to hoist it up?
Hi Jim,
The gritty details say "yes":
http://docs.python.org/2/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-
On 05/11/2013 04:44 PM, Daniel Magruder wrote:
Dear Tutor at Python.org,
I am new to the python language and have been teaching myself through various
online resources. I found an exercise where I am to create a program that
prints a list of the first 1000 prime numbers. After many attempts and
Dear Tutor at Python.org,
I am new to the python language and have been teaching myself through various
online resources. I found an exercise where I am to create a program that
prints a list of the first 1000 prime numbers. After many attempts and looking
at other answers for other ways around
On 11/05/13 07:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Pascal is still case agnostic and in that community its often seen
as a benefit...
Interesting that you say that. Just the other week I was reading a page
somewhere talking about some Pascal compiler, and it made a comment that
"by popular request" th
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Jim Mooney wrote:
> If I'm using a variable-dependent range in a for loop, is Python smart
> enough to figure the variable once so I don't have to hoist it up?
At the start of a for loop, the interpreter gets an iterator for the
iterable. The latter is evaluated
