On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Wayne Werner wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Bod Soutar wrote:
>
>> On Sep 28, 2012 4:47 AM, "Dwight Hutto" wrote:
>> > Yeah, all up in my fucking cranium with nothing but me and God to hold
>> > on to one another.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > David Hutto
>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Bod Soutar wrote:
>
> On Sep 28, 2012 4:47 AM, "Dwight Hutto" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Walter Prins wrote:
>> > Dwight,
>> >
>> > On 26 September 2012 09:26, Dwight Hutto wrote:
>> >> The only face I personally want to see of him
>> >>> bec
On 09/30/2012 06:07 PM, Cecilia Chavana-Bryant wrote:
> Hola again Python Tutor!
>
> With a friend's help I have the following code to extract reflectance data
> from an ASCII data file, do a bit of data manipulation to calibrate the
> data and then write the calibrated file into an out file.
>
> i
On 30/09/12 23:07, Cecilia Chavana-Bryant wrote:
Hola again Python Tutor!
With a friend's help I have the following code to extract reflectance
data from an ASCII data file, do a bit of data manipulation to calibrate
the data and then write the calibrated file into an out file.
I have succ
On 30/09/12 11:50, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
...I'm sure that the equations you're refering to would have
already been using lots of symbols
Yes which made them even more difficult to understand.
Quantum mechanics is hard for anyone. I don't think that an alternative
notation
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Walter Prins wrote:
>
> your problem domain and hence the target audience is a group of people
> where a certain set of symbols have a well established conventional
> set of meanings [and hence will be quite readable to them] then I
> think it's quite sensible to
Oscar,
On 30 September 2012 11:50, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> In any case I guess you won't be pleased by my discovery that, thanks to PEP
> 3131, the following is valid code in Python 3 (I've attached the code in
> case it doesn't display properly):
>
> '''
> #!/usr/bin/env python3
> # -*- encoding
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
>
> In any case I guess you won't be pleased by my discovery that, thanks to PEP
> 3131, the following is valid code in Python 3 (I've attached the code in
> case it doesn't display properly):
>
> # Parameters
> α = 1
> β = 0.1
> γ = 1.5
> δ =
On 30 September 2012 12:47, Afzal Hossain wrote:
> unsubscribe
>
>
Apologies if we're boring you. You need to click the link at the bottom of
the email to unsubscribe:
> ___
> Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription
unsubscribe
On 9/30/12, tutor-requ...@python.org wrote:
> Send Tutor mailing list submissions to
> tutor@python.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
On 30 September 2012 09:37, Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 29/09/12 23:57, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> On 29 September 2012 22:57, Alan Gauld >
>
> My point is that we should not choose short names just to keep an
>> expression on a single line
>>
>>
>> in written math too. (Most of the e
On 29/09/12 23:57, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On 29 September 2012 22:57, Alan Gauld
My point is that we should not choose short names just to keep an
expression on a single line
in written math too. (Most of the equations I remember reading from
my quantum mechanics days were
On 30/09/12 00:09, Brett Ritter wrote:
agreement. Can you point to any of the research you mention? I'd
like to read into to see how my personal experience equates with the
overall study - I might learn something!
I can probably dig out some references but a good place to start if you
have
13 matches
Mail list logo
