Yay Python:
The solution was a syntax one, if anyone else ever feels like massively
multi-plotting histograms, here is the working code:
#--
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=5, ncols=6, figsize=(12,6))
index=0
for b in axes:
for ax in b:
inde
Dear Don,
Thanks for the comment, the set type is no problem for me, this is just
a variable that I call set... and it works great for my purposes, I do
suspect it is something in the way that matplotlib/pyplot deals with
histograms, but I have not so far been able to find the right syntax.
No
On 26/06/12 23:30, Alexander Quest wrote:
My question is how does Python know to return just the part in the
parentheses and not to return the "blahblah" and the "yattayattayatta",
etc...?
If you want to know *how* Python does it you will have to read the
module code (probably in C so downloa
I'm a bit confused about extracting data using re.search or re.findall.
Say I have the following code: tuples =
re.findall(r'blahblah(\d+)yattayattayatta(\w+)moreblahblahblah(\w+)over',
text)
So I'm looking for that string in 'text', and I intend to extract the parts
which have parentheses around
On 06/26/2012 03:47 PM, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> : Would anyone have tips on how to generate random 4-digit
> : alphanumeric codes in python? Also, how does one calculate the
> : number of possible combinations?
>
> Here are some thoughts that come to my mind:
>
> import string
>
Hello,
: Would anyone have tips on how to generate random 4-digit
: alphanumeric codes in python? Also, how does one calculate the
: number of possible combinations?
Here are some thoughts that come to my mind:
import string
import random
# -- technique #1, using random.choice
pri
On 6/26/2012 1:10 AM Alan Gauld said...
On 26/06/12 02:22, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I think you've messed up your quoting. It was Mike Nickey, not Emile,
who suggested using w[0] == 'x'.
Yes, but Emile's comment was in context of Mike's assertion about w[0].
However, reading it back I think tha
Correcting what was said below.
- If not, then it's a little more complicated, calculate (length) *
(length-1) * (length-2) * (length-3), or in other words the factorial of
length divided by the factorial of (length - 4). In my example, 62! /
(62-4)! = 13,388,280
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:08 AM,
First of all, determine your alphabet (the pool of characters you'll derive
your 4-character code from):
- For example, using an English alphabet with both lowercase and uppercase
letters and digits 0-9 makes for 62 characters (26 + 26 + 10).
Then, ask if you want to allow a character to repeat i
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Sithembewena Lloyd Dube
wrote:
> HI,
>
> Would anyone have tips on how to generate random 4-digit alphanumeric
> codes in python? Also, how does one calculate the number of possible
> combinations?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
Python's, random module is your friend.
HI,
Would anyone have tips on how to generate random 4-digit alphanumeric codes
in python? Also, how does one calculate the number of possible combinations?
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Sithembewena Lloyd Dube
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
Hi everyone,
Is there any decent barcode decoder software which one could use to read
image barcodes and return a result to a calling function/ app? I wish to
implement a Python server backend which would import and use such a module
(if it were that, for instance).
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Sithembe
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:40:50 +1000
> From: Elaina Ann Hyde
> To: tutor@python.org
> Subject: [Tutor] Looping over histogram plots
>set=(dat['a'+str(index)] == 1.00)
You should not override the builtin set() type [1] as you've done here by
assigning it.
> #write the
Hello all,
I have been making some big multiplots lately and found a nice little
way of writing out 30 plots as follows, this part works great and leads up
to my question, here I have 30 sets defined by the set=(), in this case I
get a nice arrangement of 30 plots for V(GSR) and Log(g) (2 variab
On 26/06/12 02:22, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I think you've messed up your quoting. It was Mike Nickey, not Emile,
who suggested using w[0] == 'x'.
Yes, but Emile's comment was in context of Mike's assertion about w[0].
However, reading it back I think that the "This" in Emile's comment was
actu
15 matches
Mail list logo
