David wrote:
Subject:
Re: [Tutor] Find files without __doc__ strings
From:
David
Date:
Mon, 18 May 2009 14:02:38 -0400
CC:
tutor@python.org
Lie Ryan wrote:
David wrote:
spir wrote:
Le Sat, 16 May 2009 21:46:02 -0400
> I've been told numerous times that using __del__ is not the way to handle
> clean-up because it is finicky.
matthew,
welcome to Python and this Tutor mailing list!
and yes, i'll echo everyone else in saqying that using __del__ should
be avoided. the most critical issues regarding this is becau
"Strax-Haber, Matthew (LARC-D320)" wrote
My class sub-types dict. In __init__, there is a call to
self.update(pickle.load()). For some reason, this triggers
__del__. Why?
A pure guess, but maybe the pickle load creates a new instance which
replaces the original which then gets garbage col
To all the generous Python coders on this list,
I've been told numerous times that using __del__ is not the way to handle
clean-up because it is finicky. Fine. However, how should I handle the
following problem:
A folder is created during object instantiation. This is necessary because
multiple ot
"spir" wrote
Also, it's the first time I really have to cope with machine-time;
so I'm totally new to technics like using a profiler.
Any hints on the topics heartfully welcome :-)
Profilers are a bit like debuggers. Very useful when needed
but usually a point of last resort.
First, what
Lie Ryan wrote:
> David wrote:
>> spir wrote:
>>> Le Sat, 16 May 2009 21:46:02 -0400,
>>> David s'exprima ainsi:
>>>
I am doing an exercise in Wesley Chun's book. Find files in the
standard library modules that have doc strings. Then find the
ones that don't, "the shame list". I c
Hello,
I have an big performance problem with an app I'm currently working on.
It "suddenly" runs at least 5 times slower that it used to. The issue is,
beeing in a finalization phase, I'm all the time touching thingies here and
there. But performance change is visible only when running on big t
--
powered by Gentoo/GNU Linux
http://linuxcrazy.com
--- Begin Message ---
Lie Ryan wrote:
> David wrote:
>> spir wrote:
>>> Le Sat, 16 May 2009 21:46:02 -0400,
>>> David s'exprima ainsi:
>>>
I am doing an exercise in Wesley Chun's book. Find files in the
standard library modules th
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Dinesh B Vadhia
wrote:
> The structure of the gzip files are:
>
> gzip archive
> folderA
> folderB
> list of folderC's
> each folderC contains the target files
>
> Within the archive, I want to open the gzip archive, open fo
The structure of the gzip files are:
gzip archive
folderA
folderB
list of folderC's
each folderC contains the target files
Within the archive, I want to open the gzip archive, open folderA, openFolderB
, get the list of target files in folderC, and extract
> "Allen Fowler" wrote
> > I have several CGI scripts that I would like coordinate via a "First In /
> First Out" style buffer.That is, some processes are adding work units,
> and
> some take the oldest and start work on them.
> >
> > What is the right way to do this?I suppose I cou
David wrote:
spir wrote:
Le Sat, 16 May 2009 21:46:02 -0400,
David s'exprima ainsi:
I am doing an exercise in Wesley Chun's book. Find files in the
standard library modules that have doc strings. Then find the ones
that don't, "the shame list". I came up with this to find the ones with;
Alan Gauld wrote:
"MK" wrote
Seems that i did it the wrong way still from the beginning.
I did it now with open and write an empty file.
But anyway i would wish to know if it is possible to terminate
a running cat.
It depends on what you mean by a running cat.
Of course it meant "a runn
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Allen Fowler wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have several CGI scripts that I would like coordinate via a "First In /
> First Out" style buffer. That is, some processes are adding work units,
> and some take the oldest and start work on them.
>
> What is the right way
Le Mon, 18 May 2009 08:19:21 +0100,
"Alan Gauld" s'exprima ainsi:
> If
> you never, or rarely, have concurrent accesses then using
> a text file might work.
That's what I would do. New tasks appended --> oldest one = first one (first
line, probably).
For access sharing, then you can have a v
"Allen Fowler" wrote
I have several CGI scripts that I would like coordinate via a
"First In / First Out" style buffer.That is, some processes
are adding work units, and some take the oldest and
start work on them.
What is the right way to do this?
I suppose I could use an SQL ser
16 matches
Mail list logo
