> > a is b <==> id(a) == id(b)
>
> No, not necessarily. id's are recycled which can lead to unexpected
> behaviour when comparing them. See for example this thread on c.l.py:
> http://tinyurl.com/yflknx
wow, that is totally mind-blowing.. good post. i think that for most
normal objects that are *n
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Yi Qiang wrote:
> I am trying to get some basic information about the computer's hardware
> specs in OSX in python. In linux I can get most of what I need from the
> /proc filesystem. Is there an equivalent in OSX? If not, where else
> can I get information about the sy
Hi,
I am trying to get some basic information about the computer's
hardware specs in OSX in python. In linux I can get most of what I
need from the /proc filesystem. Is there an equivalent in OSX? If
not, where else can I get information about the system from? I need
CPU model, # of cpus, cpu s
On 08/11/06, Carroll, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct indeed. But lambda functions ARE anonymous.
>
> "Python supports the creation of anonymous functions (i.e.
> functions that are not bound to a name) at runtime, using
> a construct called "lambda".
>
Hello again.
> -Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:56:42 -
> From: "Alan Gauld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Ruby Code Blocks vs. Python Lambdas
> To: tutor@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859
> -Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:20:16 +0100
> From: Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] Ruby Code Blocks vs. Python Lambdas
> To: Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: tutor@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; char
* Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061107 08:27]:
> Apropos of nothing at all...
>
> "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Carroll, Barry wrote:
> >> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby
> >
> > Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas.
>
> And Andreas, Danny a
Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 17:22 + schrieb Alan Gauld:
> Apropos of nothing at all...
>
> "Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Carroll, Barry wrote:
> >> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby
> >
> > Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas.
>
> And Andr
Apropos of nothing at all...
"Kent Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Carroll, Barry wrote:
>> ... consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby
>
> Sounds like you had a table full of Pythonistas.
And Andreas, Danny and I also argued for Ruby.
And elsewhere Tim making a case for Rebo
* Alan Gauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061107 01:02]:
>
> "Tim Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> allows us to embed loops and all sorts, effectively adding new
> >> command structures to the language in a way that only Lisp
> >> and Tcl have really been good at up till now.
> >
> > Sorry Alan,
Carlos wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> Ok, after reading your comments I ended up with this:
>
> #Easy_2DCA_01.py
> #A very basic 2D script that lets you play with Wolfram's rule 30
>
> A_List = [0]*10+[1]+[0]*10
> A_Len = len(A_List)
> B_List = []
> print A_List
> Iterations = 5
>
> rule_30 = {
>
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:20, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> That's bullshit. Python and Ruby are quite comparable
Gee Andreas tell us how you really feel! BTW I agree that Python and Ruby are
very close.
John
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
h
Hi Folks,
I want to install SOAPpy module. As stated on http://pywebsvcs.sourceforge.net/soappy.txt, there are two modules that should be installed prior to installing SOAPpy. One in pyXML and the other is fpconst. I installed pyXML from the URL stated on teh above website.
But the URL for fpcon
Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 09:56 + schrieb Alan Gauld:
> "Carroll, Barry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > Thank you for this post. I was in a discussion of Ruby vs. Python
> > at
> > lunch today. The consensus was that Python was much better than
> > Ruby in
> > all ways.
That's bullshi
wesley chun wrote:
>> 3)is there a special method for `is'.
>
> no, not really. you can use id() and '==' to proxy for is:
>
> a is b <==> id(a) == id(b)
No, not necessarily. id's are recycled which can lead to unexpected
behaviour when comparing them. See for example this thread on c.l.py:
htt
"Carlos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> As you may have noticed the name of the script has changed, I will
> now
> try a 3D CA. I have been thinking that the best way to do this would
> be
> to use a matrix, like those found in SciPy. Do you think this is a
> good
> idea?
Using a matrix is fine
Carroll, Barry wrote:
> Thank you for this post. I was in a discussion of Ruby vs. Python at
> lunch today. The consensus was that Python was much better than Ruby in
> all ways. Since I know very little about Ruby, I had nothing to add to
> the conversation.
Sounds like you had a table full
Reposting to the list.
--- Asrarahmed Kadri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >except ValueError:
> > >flag = False
> > >startdate = None
> > >enddate = None
> > >err_msg = traceback.format_exc()
> > >index =
Hello to all,
Ok, after reading your comments I ended up with this:
#Easy_2DCA_01.py
#A very basic 2D script that lets you play with Wolfram's rule 30
A_List = [0]*10+[1]+[0]*10
A_Len = len(A_List)
B_List = []
print A_List
Iterations = 5
rule_30 = {
(1, 1, 1) : 0,
(1, 1, 0) : 0,
"Eli Brosh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> How do i set the PYTHONPATH variable ?
> How is it done under Windows XP ?
Go to MyComputer and right click, select Properties
Go to the Advanced Tab
Click the EnvironmentVariables button
In the lower window, labelled System Variables look for PYTHONPA
"Carroll, Barry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Thank you for this post. I was in a discussion of Ruby vs. Python
> at
> lunch today. The consensus was that Python was much better than
> Ruby in
> all ways.
That's a little hard on Ruby. There are many good features and several
of them are arguab
"Tim Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> allows us to embed loops and all sorts, effectively adding new
>> command structures to the language in a way that only Lisp
>> and Tcl have really been good at up till now.
>
> Sorry Alan, but you are leaving out rebol. Command structures
> in rebol
Linda,
>- Original Message -
> From: "linda.s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Danny Yoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Alan Gauld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tutor"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:00 AM
> Subject: a line
I can't speak for Danny, but I'd apprreciate if you could just
post y
23 matches
Mail list logo
