Re: [Tutor] IDLE will not appear under Win95 (Python 2.4.2)

2005-10-16 Thread Danny Yoo
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Dave Shea wrote: > Python installed without a complaint. However, when I fire up IDLE, > there is an hour glass shown for a couple of seconds, then nothing else > happens. When I fire up Python (command line) no problem, the DOS box > opens and Python starts. I've tried re-s

Re: [Tutor] Focus on the functions [Was Re: if-else statements]

2005-10-16 Thread Danny Yoo
> Having studied the examples given here, I am beginning to get some > understanding of what is going on. If only I could find many more > examples like these, in simple English, I would be a very happy student. [Note: this is a fairly long post. Didn't know how to do the subject justice withou

Re: [Tutor] Focus on the functions [Was Re: if-else statements]

2005-10-16 Thread Pujo Aji
Dear Norman,   You can reuse function, this make your code more easy to handle. Suppose you have  code  to calculate area of rectangle, but this time you like to calculate 3 times:   width = 3; length = 2 print 'area', width * length   width = 1; length =32 print 'area', width * length   width =

Re: [Tutor] IDLE will not appear under Win95 (Python 2.4.2)

2005-10-16 Thread Adam
On 16/10/05, Dave Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Adam,Thanks for your reponse. I tried your suggestion of starting IDLE via thecommand line.Using the command and parameter line that install created behind the Python(IDLE) icon on my Start menu: C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP>"C:\Program Files\Python24\pyth

Re: [Tutor] Focus on the functions [Was Re: if-else statements]

2005-10-16 Thread bob
At 08:11 AM 10/16/2005, Norman Silverstone wrote: >I am an elderly person somewhat physically handicapped with some >experience programming in basic and pascal, many years ago. In order to >keep myself mentally active I decided to have a look once again at >programming and chose python as a good l

Re: [Tutor] Focus on the functions [Was Re: if-else statements]

2005-10-16 Thread Norman Silverstone
> I apologize to the list again for the noisy contentless ranting I made > yesterday, so I'll try making it up by doing concrete demos of a > function-focused approach. This will critique Zelle's Chapter Two and > Chapter Five, and see what things would look like if under a function > regime. >